GOLD vs. AEM
Compare and contrast key facts about Gold.com, Inc (GOLD) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).
Performance
GOLD vs. AEM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOLD vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GOLD Gold.com, Inc | 18.11% | 14.34% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 19.95% | -0.14% |
Fundamentals
GOLD:
$1.02B
AEM:
$102.04B
GOLD:
$0.48
AEM:
$8.83
GOLD:
84.27
AEM:
22.98
GOLD:
0.07
AEM:
8.61
GOLD:
1.56
AEM:
4.12
GOLD:
$15.68B
AEM:
$11.87B
GOLD:
$288.97M
AEM:
$6.80B
GOLD:
$6.19M
AEM:
$8.35B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 18.11% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 19.95% return.
GOLD
- 1D
- 5.53%
- 1M
- -30.26%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEM
- 1D
- 5.80%
- 1M
- -19.18%
- YTD
- 19.95%
- 6M
- 20.91%
- 1Y
- 89.16%
- 3Y*
- 61.82%
- 5Y*
- 30.88%
- 10Y*
- 20.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GOLD vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank
GOLD
AEM
GOLD vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold.com, Inc (GOLD) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOLD | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.40 | 0.18 | +2.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOLD and AEM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GOLD vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison
GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than AEM's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLD Gold.com, Inc | 0.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited | 0.81% | 0.94% | 2.05% | 2.92% | 3.08% | 2.63% | 2.36% | 0.89% | 1.09% | 0.89% | 0.86% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
GOLD vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -40.58%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and AEM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOLD | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.58% | -90.49% | +49.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -37.30% | -19.51% | -17.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.26% | -46.76% | +37.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.35% | — |
Volatility
GOLD vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOLD | AEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 35.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.88% | 43.99% | +20.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.88% | 36.39% | +28.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.88% | 37.45% | +27.43% |
Financials
GOLD vs. AEM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gold.com, Inc and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GOLD vs. AEM - Profitability Comparison
GOLD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 93.37M and revenue of 6.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.4%.
AEM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a gross profit of 2.20B and revenue of 3.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.7%.
GOLD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported an operating income of 41.17M and revenue of 6.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.6%.
AEM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported an operating income of 1.99B and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.9%.
GOLD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Gold.com, Inc reported a net income of 11.64M and revenue of 6.48B, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
AEM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Agnico Eagle Mines Limited reported a net income of 1.52B and revenue of 3.56B, resulting in a net margin of 42.7%.