GOLD vs. NEM

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLD has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 5.62%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current GOLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is comparable to the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than NEM's 2.65% yield.

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -88.52%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) is 10.25%, while Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) has a volatility of 17.98%. This indicates that GOLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.