PortfoliosLab logo
GOLD vs. NEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GOLD and NEM is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

GOLD vs. NEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GOLD:

0.29

NEM:

0.61

Sortino Ratio

GOLD:

0.69

NEM:

1.08

Omega Ratio

GOLD:

1.08

NEM:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

GOLD:

0.18

NEM:

0.48

Martin Ratio

GOLD:

0.90

NEM:

1.39

Ulcer Index

GOLD:

12.71%

NEM:

17.99%

Daily Std Dev

GOLD:

35.61%

NEM:

36.93%

Max Drawdown

GOLD:

-88.51%

NEM:

-77.55%

Current Drawdown

GOLD:

-57.83%

NEM:

-34.08%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GOLD:

$32.43B

NEM:

$56.52B

EPS

GOLD:

$1.32

NEM:

$4.39

PE Ratio

GOLD:

14.29

NEM:

11.57

PEG Ratio

GOLD:

1.50

NEM:

0.79

PS Ratio

GOLD:

2.45

NEM:

2.87

PB Ratio

GOLD:

1.37

NEM:

1.92

Total Revenue (TTM)

GOLD:

$13.30B

NEM:

$19.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GOLD:

$5.37B

NEM:

$7.72B

EBITDA (TTM)

GOLD:

$5.71B

NEM:

$9.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOLD achieves a 18.28% return, which is significantly lower than NEM's 37.24% return. Over the past 10 years, GOLD has underperformed NEM with an annualized return of 5.30%, while NEM has yielded a comparatively higher 8.81% annualized return.


GOLD

YTD

18.28%

1M

-11.46%

6M

5.97%

1Y

10.09%

5Y*

-4.37%

10Y*

5.30%

NEM

YTD

37.24%

1M

-7.62%

6M

21.39%

1Y

22.25%

5Y*

-1.35%

10Y*

8.81%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GOLD vs. NEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOLD is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOLD is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOLD is 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOLD is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOLD is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOLD is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

NEM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEM is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEM is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEM is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEM is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEM is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEM is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GOLD vs. NEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GOLD Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the NEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOLD and NEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GOLD vs. NEM - Dividend Comparison

GOLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, more than NEM's 1.97% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GOLD
Barrick Gold Corporation
2.19%2.58%2.21%3.78%1.89%1.36%0.70%1.40%0.83%0.50%1.90%1.87%
NEM
Newmont Goldcorp Corporation
1.97%2.69%3.87%4.66%3.55%1.74%3.31%1.62%0.67%0.37%0.56%1.19%

Drawdowns

GOLD vs. NEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOLD drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than NEM's maximum drawdown of -77.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOLD and NEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GOLD vs. NEM - Volatility Comparison

Barrick Gold Corporation (GOLD) and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation (NEM) have volatilities of 13.81% and 13.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GOLD vs. NEM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Barrick Gold Corporation and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
3.13B
5.01B
(GOLD) Total Revenue
(NEM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GOLD vs. NEM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Barrick Gold Corporation and Newmont Goldcorp Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%20212022202320242025
43.0%
46.1%
(GOLD) Gross Margin
(NEM) Gross Margin
GOLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.35B and revenue of 3.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.

NEM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.31B and revenue of 5.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.1%.

GOLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barrick Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.3%.

NEM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported an operating income of 2.02B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.2%.

GOLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Barrick Gold Corporation reported a net income of 474.00M and revenue of 3.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.1%.

NEM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Newmont Goldcorp Corporation reported a net income of 1.89B and revenue of 5.01B, resulting in a net margin of 37.7%.