PHYD vs. ZTOP
PHYD (Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -) and ZTOP (F/m High Yield 100 ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PHYD is actively managed, while ZTOP is passively managed. Over the past year, PHYD returned 7.97% vs 6.44% for ZTOP. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PHYD charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for ZTOP.
Performance
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than ZTOP's 1.64% return.
PHYD
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 3.00%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 8.82%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTOP
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.30%
- 1Y
- 6.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 2.49% | 9.41% |
ZTOP F/m High Yield 100 ETF | 1.64% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PHYD and ZTOP is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025 | 0.83 |
The correlation between PHYD and ZTOP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PHYD vs. ZTOP — Risk / Return Rank
PHYD
ZTOP
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PHYD | ZTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.40 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.82 | 2.56 | +1.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.70 | 11.67 | +4.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PHYD | ZTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | 1.97 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 2.50 | -0.76 |
Drawdowns
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, which is greater than ZTOP's maximum drawdown of -2.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and ZTOP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PHYD | ZTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.33% | -2.52% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -2.52% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.17% | -0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.62% | -0.29% | -0.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.55% | -0.04% |
Volatility
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Volatility Comparison
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) have volatilities of 1.07% and 1.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PHYD | ZTOP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.07% | 1.03% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 2.59% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.35% | 3.29% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 3.48% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 3.48% | +1.11% |
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison
PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTOP's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PHYD vs. ZTOP - Dividend Comparison
PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, more than ZTOP's 6.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PHYD Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - | 9.02% | 6.63% | 6.80% | 6.15% |
ZTOP F/m High Yield 100 ETF | 6.24% | 4.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PHYD and ZTOP have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PHYD has higher volatility (1.07%) compared to ZTOP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs ZTOP's -2.52%.
On 1-year performance, PHYD leads with 7.97% vs 6.44% for ZTOP. On fees, ZTOP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 7.97% return vs 6.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZTOP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PHYD.
PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.02%, compared with 6.24% for ZTOP.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.39% for ZTOP.
PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PHYD and ZTOP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer