PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYD vs. HYBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYD vs. HYBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than HYBL's 1.31% return.


PHYD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
10Y*

HYBL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.31%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.71%
3Y*
8.65%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYD vs. HYBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
2.61%8.84%7.35%8.07%
HYBL
SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF
1.31%7.78%9.12%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYD and HYBL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023

0.73

The correlation between PHYD and HYBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYD vs. HYBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYD
PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HYBL
HYBL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
HYBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYBL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HYBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYBL Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYD vs. HYBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYDHYBLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.54

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

3.88

+0.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.52

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

2.76

+1.22

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.58

10.17

+6.41

PHYD vs. HYBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the HYBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYD and HYBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYDHYBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.76

1.26

+0.50

Drawdowns

PHYD vs. HYBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, smaller than the maximum HYBL drawdown of -8.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and HYBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYDHYBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-8.46%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-2.41%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-4.32%

+0.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

0.00%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-1.35%

+0.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

0.66%

-0.16%

Volatility

PHYD vs. HYBL - Volatility Comparison

Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) has a higher volatility of 0.93% compared to SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF (HYBL) at 0.65%. This indicates that PHYD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYDHYBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

0.65%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

2.14%

+0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

2.65%

+0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

4.58%

0.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

4.58%

0.00%

PHYD vs. HYBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than HYBL's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYD vs. HYBL - Dividend Comparison

PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, more than HYBL's 7.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
HYBL
SPDR Blackstone High Income ETF
7.10%7.22%7.88%7.93%5.10%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
9.01%6.63%6.80%6.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYD and HYBL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHYD has higher volatility (0.93%) compared to HYBL (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs HYBL's -8.46%.

On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.86% vs 8.65% for HYBL. On fees, PHYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, HYBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for HYBL.

PHYD has the higher dividend yield at 9.01%, compared with 7.10% for HYBL.

They also come from different issuers: Putnam and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.70% for HYBL.

PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYD and HYBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer