PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTOP vs. SPIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTOP achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 24.45% return.


ZTOP

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.35%
6M
1.01%
YTD
1.62%
1Y
4.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.51%

SPIT

1D
0.51%
1M
-5.03%
6M
16.23%
YTD
24.45%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$242.68K$282.09K$201.11K
$9.29K$12.01K$41.65K

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
1.62%1.17%
SPIT
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
24.45%5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTOP and SPIT is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTOP vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ZTOP
ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ZTOPSPITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.69

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTOP drawdown since its inception was -2.52%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTOP and SPIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOPSPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-12.49%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.46%

-7.55%

+7.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-2.85%

+2.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

Volatility

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOPSPITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30%

26.59%

-23.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.38%

26.59%

-23.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.38%

26.59%

-23.21%

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTOP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTOP vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

ZTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%, more than SPIT's 5.77% yield.


PositionTTM2025
SPIT
F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF
5.77%7.18%
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
6.29%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTOP and SPIT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZTOP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZTOP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

ZTOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.29%, compared with 5.77% for SPIT.

ZTOP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while SPIT is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZTOP and 0.89% for SPIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTOP and SPIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer