PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PHYD vs. PBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PHYD vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PHYD achieves a 2.61% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -7.76% return.


PHYD

1D
-0.06%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
2.61%
6M
3.21%
1Y
8.46%
3Y*
8.86%
5Y*
10Y*

PBDC

1D
-0.94%
1M
-4.38%
YTD
-7.76%
6M
-7.02%
1Y
-8.11%
3Y*
8.54%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PHYD vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
2.61%8.84%7.35%8.07%
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
-7.76%-1.77%19.43%22.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PHYD and PBDC is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2023

0.44

PHYD vs. PBDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PHYD
PBDC

Technology

0.8%

-

Healthcare

0.7%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Industrials

0.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Energy

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.0%

Technology

PHYD
0.8%
PBDC

-

Healthcare

PHYD
0.7%
PBDC

-

Utilities

PHYD
0.7%
PBDC

-

Industrials

PHYD
0.7%
PBDC

-

Consumer Defensive

PHYD
0.5%
PBDC

-

Energy

PHYD
0.3%
PBDC

-

Consumer Cyclical

PHYD
0.2%
PBDC

-

Real Estate

PHYD
0.1%
PBDC

-

Basic Materials

PHYD

-

PBDC

-

Communication Services

PHYD

-

PBDC

-

Financial Services

PHYD

-

PBDC
100.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PHYD vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PHYD
PHYD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PBDC
PBDC Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PBDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBDC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
PBDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBDC Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PHYD vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PHYDPBDCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

-0.45

+3.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.11

-0.52

+4.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

0.94

+0.59

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

-0.44

+4.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.58

-0.82

+17.40

PHYD vs. PBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PHYD Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the PBDC Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PHYD and PBDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PHYDPBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

-0.45

+3.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.76

0.77

+0.99

Drawdowns

PHYD vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PHYD drawdown since its inception was -4.33%, smaller than the maximum PBDC drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PHYD and PBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PHYDPBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-20.47%

+16.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-20.15%

+18.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.14%

-20.47%

+16.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-15.39%

+14.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.62%

-4.65%

+4.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

10.89%

-10.39%

Volatility

PHYD vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam ESG High Yield ETF - (PHYD) is 0.93%, while Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) has a volatility of 4.76%. This indicates that PHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PHYDPBDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.93%

4.76%

-3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

14.89%

-12.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

18.21%

-14.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.58%

17.01%

-12.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.58%

17.01%

-12.43%

PHYD vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PHYD has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PHYD vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison

PHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.01%, less than PBDC's 11.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PBDC
Putnam BDC Income ETF
11.44%10.53%9.29%9.86%3.40%
PHYD
Putnam ESG High Yield ETF -
9.01%6.63%6.80%6.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PHYD and PBDC have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PBDC has higher volatility (4.76%) compared to PHYD (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PHYD dropped -4.33% vs PBDC's -20.47%.

On 3-year performance, PHYD leads with 8.86% vs 8.54% for PBDC. On fees, PHYD is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PHYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, PHYD has performed better with a 8.86% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PHYD is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PBDC.

PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.44%, compared with 9.01% for PHYD.

PHYD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while PBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PHYD and 0.75% for PBDC.

PHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PHYD and PBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer