PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ZTOP vs. ZHOG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTOP achieves a 1.53% return, which is significantly higher than ZHOG's 0.77% return.


ZTOP

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.35%
YTD
1.53%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZHOG

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.77%
6M
1.11%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
1.53%8.13%
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
0.77%6.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTOP and ZHOG is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2025

0.68

The correlation between ZTOP and ZHOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ZTOP vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTOP
ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ZHOG
ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ZTOPZHOGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.72

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

4.25

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

18.40

-6.54

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is lower than the ZHOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTOP and ZHOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ZTOPZHOGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00

3.50

-1.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.48

1.62

+0.86

Drawdowns

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTOP drawdown since its inception was -2.52%, smaller than the maximum ZHOG drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTOP and ZHOG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ZTOPZHOGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.66%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.52%

-1.31%

-1.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

-0.08%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-0.70%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.30%

+0.25%

Volatility

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison

F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) has a higher volatility of 1.04% compared to F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) at 0.45%. This indicates that ZTOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ZTOPZHOGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

0.45%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.59%

1.14%

+1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.29%

1.59%

+1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.01%

-0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.49%

4.01%

-0.52%

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTOP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

ZTOP vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison

ZTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, more than ZHOG's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
ZHOG
F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
5.11%5.35%5.50%1.70%
ZTOP
F/m High Yield 100 ETF
6.24%4.39%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ZTOP and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ZTOP has higher volatility (1.04%) compared to ZHOG (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTOP dropped -2.52% vs ZHOG's -3.66%.

On 1-year performance, ZTOP leads with 6.55% vs 5.54% for ZHOG. On fees, ZTOP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ZHOG has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ZTOP has performed better with a 6.55% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ZTOP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for ZHOG.

ZTOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.24%, compared with 5.11% for ZHOG.

ZTOP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while ZHOG is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZTOP and 0.43% for ZHOG.

ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ZTOP and ZHOG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer