ZTOP vs. LFSC

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ZTOP (F/m High Yield 100 ETF) and LFSC (F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ZTOP is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. High Yield Top 100 Quality Select Equal Weighted Index, while LFSC is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by F/m Investments. ZTOP is passively managed, while LFSC is actively managed. Over the past year, ZTOP returned 6.01% vs 75.19% for LFSC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ZTOP charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.54%/yr for LFSC.

Performance

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ZTOP achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than LFSC's 15.76% return.

ZTOP

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 6.01%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LFSC

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: 10.64%
• YTD: 15.76%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 75.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ZTOP F/m High Yield 100 ETF	1.72%	8.06%
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	15.76%	72.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ZTOP and LFSC is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

ZTOP vs. LFSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ZTOP

ZTOP Risk / Return Rank: 57
ZTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ZTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ZTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 61
ZTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
ZTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 62

LFSC

LFSC Risk / Return Rank: 83
LFSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
LFSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
LFSC Omega Ratio Rank: 79
LFSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
LFSC Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) and F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ZTOP	LFSC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	2.85	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	3.78	-1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.45	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.39	4.65	-2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.83	12.98	-2.16

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ZTOP Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is lower than the LFSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ZTOP and LFSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ZTOP drawdown since its inception was -2.52%, smaller than the maximum LFSC drawdown of -29.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ZTOP and LFSC.

Drawdown Indicators

	ZTOP	LFSC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.52%	-29.74%	+27.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.52%	-16.25%	+13.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	0.00%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.29%	-7.60%	+7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.56%	5.81%	-5.25%

Volatility

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F/m High Yield 100 ETF (ZTOP) is 0.83%, while F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF (LFSC) has a volatility of 7.93%. This indicates that ZTOP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LFSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ZTOP	LFSC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.83%	7.93%	-7.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.66%	18.96%	-16.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.33%	26.61%	-23.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.47%	28.93%	-25.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.47%	28.93%	-25.46%

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

ZTOP has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than LFSC's 0.54% expense ratio.

Dividends

ZTOP vs. LFSC - Dividend Comparison

ZTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, while LFSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
LFSC F/m Emerald Life Sciences Innovation ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ZTOP F/m High Yield 100 ETF	6.27%	4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ZTOP and LFSC in my portfolio?

ZTOP and LFSC have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ZTOP or LFSC?

LFSC has higher volatility (7.93%) compared to ZTOP (0.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ZTOP dropped -2.52% vs LFSC's -29.74%.

Which ETF is better, ZTOP or LFSC?

On 1-year performance, LFSC leads with 75.19% vs 6.01% for ZTOP. On fees, ZTOP is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ZTOP has been the lower-risk option at 0.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ZTOP or LFSC?

Over the 1-year period, LFSC has performed better with a 75.19% return vs 6.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ZTOP or LFSC?

ZTOP is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.54% for LFSC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ZTOP or LFSC?

ZTOP has the higher dividend yield at 6.27%, compared with 0.00% for LFSC.

What is the main difference between ZTOP and LFSC?

ZTOP is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while LFSC is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for ZTOP and 0.54% for LFSC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LFSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.