PGRO vs. PFUT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT).

PGRO and PFUT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PGRO is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021. PFUT is an actively managed fund by Power Corporation of Canada. It was launched on May 25, 2021.

Performance

PGRO vs. PFUT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PGRO vs. PFUT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	-9.76%	15.13%	34.01%	45.19%	-31.53%	16.67%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	-7.59%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a -9.76% return, which is significantly lower than PFUT's -7.59% return.

PGRO

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -5.32%
• YTD: -9.76%
• 6M: -9.34%
• 1Y: 16.44%
• 3Y*: 20.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PFUT

• 1D: 2.92%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: -7.59%
• 6M: -9.75%
• 1Y: 5.81%
• 3Y*: 8.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGRO vs. PFUT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGRO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PFUT's 0.64% expense ratio.

PFUT

Putnam Sustainable Future ETF

PGRO

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

PGRO vs. PFUT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGRO

PGRO Risk / Return Rank: 41
PGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
PGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 37

PFUT

PFUT Risk / Return Rank: 19
PFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
PFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
PFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGRO vs. PFUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PGRO	PFUT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	0.26	+0.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.54	+0.67
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.00	0.37	+0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.36	1.11	+2.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PGRO vs. PFUT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the PFUT Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGRO and PFUT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PGRO	PFUT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	0.26	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	-0.07	+0.54

Correlation

The correlation between PGRO and PFUT is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

PGRO vs. PFUT - Dividend Comparison

PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF	0.02%	0.02%	0.08%	0.19%	0.12%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PGRO vs. PFUT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, smaller than the maximum PFUT drawdown of -44.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and PFUT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PGRO	PFUT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.73%	-44.86%	+10.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.34%	-14.88%	-1.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.31%	-18.58%	+5.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.54%	-21.44%	+10.90%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.85%	4.92%	-0.07%

Volatility

PGRO vs. PFUT - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) at 6.40%. This indicates that PGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PGRO	PFUT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.91%	6.40%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.72%	12.45%	+0.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.89%	22.41%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.93%	21.86%	+0.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.93%	21.86%	+0.07%