PGRO vs. PGR
PGRO (Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while PGR (The Progressive Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PGRO returned 14.70%/yr vs 17.10%/yr for PGR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PGRO vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGRO achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than PGR's -8.03% return.
PGRO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 10.18%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 27.37%
- 3Y*
- 25.15%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- —
PGR
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- -1.25%
- YTD
- -8.03%
- 6M
- -8.45%
- 1Y
- -27.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.10%
- 10Y*
- 22.96%
PGRO vs. PGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 10.18% | 15.13% | 34.01% | 45.19% | -31.53% | 16.67% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | -8.03% | -3.02% | 51.39% | 23.16% | 26.81% | 6.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGRO and PGR is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between PGRO and PGR shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGRO vs. PGR — Risk / Return Rank
PGRO
PGR
PGRO vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGRO | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.71 | -1.24 | +2.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.35 | -1.72 | +4.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.80 | +0.50 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | -0.89 | +2.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | -1.26 | +6.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGRO | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | -1.24 | +2.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.70 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.94 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.58 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
PGRO vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGRO drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, smaller than the maximum PGR drawdown of -71.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGRO and PGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGRO | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -71.06% | +36.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.34% | -29.41% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.31% | -30.35% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.73% | -30.35% | -4.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -28.00% | +27.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -14.53% | +4.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.95% | 21.03% | -16.08% |
Volatility
PGRO vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF (PGRO) is 3.87%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 5.58%. This indicates that PGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGRO | PGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 5.58% | -1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 16.17% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.07% | 22.22% | -6.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.81% | 24.51% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 24.43% | -2.66% |
Dividends
PGRO vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
PGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than PGR's 7.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 7.06% | 2.15% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% |
PGRO Putnam Focused Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.08% | 0.19% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGRO and PGR have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGR has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to PGRO (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGRO dropped -34.73% vs PGR's -71.06%.
PGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGRO and PGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer