PFUT vs. BASG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and BASG (Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while BASG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Brown Advisory. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for BASG.

Performance

PFUT vs. BASG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PFUT having a 4.40% return and BASG slightly lower at 4.35%.

PFUT

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 4.24%
• YTD: 4.40%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 6.81%
• 3Y*: 12.28%
• 5Y*: 0.95%
• 10Y*: —

BASG

• 1D: -1.72%
• 1M: 7.15%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. BASG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	4.40%	2.95%
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	4.35%	2.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and BASG is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. BASG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

PFUT Risk / Return Rank: 15
PFUT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
PFUT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
PFUT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
PFUT Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
PFUT Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. BASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF (BASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFUT	BASG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.71	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.33	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFUT	BASG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.41	-0.36

Drawdowns

PFUT vs. BASG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFUT drawdown since its inception was -44.86%, which is greater than BASG's maximum drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFUT and BASG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	BASG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.86%	-19.30%	-25.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.57%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-1.98%	-6.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.11%	-5.84%	-15.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.14%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	BASG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.08%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.59%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.17%	16.65%	-0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.75%	16.65%	+5.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.71%	16.65%	+5.06%

PFUT vs. BASG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than BASG's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. BASG - Dividend Comparison

Neither PFUT nor BASG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BASG Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and BASG in my portfolio?

PFUT and BASG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or BASG?

On fees, BASG is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or BASG?

BASG is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for PFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or BASG?

PFUT and BASG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PFUT and BASG?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while BASG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Brown Advisory. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.61% for BASG.