PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGR vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PGR vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a -5.09% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 30.26% return. Over the past 10 years, PGR has outperformed MAR with an annualized return of 23.64%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively lower 21.03% annualized return.


PGR

1D
0.42%
1M
3.65%
YTD
-5.09%
6M
-7.97%
1Y
-19.42%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
19.40%
10Y*
23.64%

MAR

1D
1.42%
1M
15.18%
YTD
30.26%
6M
35.28%
1Y
54.28%
3Y*
31.68%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PGR vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
-5.09%-3.02%51.39%23.16%26.81%10.84%41.48%25.14%9.39%61.59%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
30.26%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between PGR and MAR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1993

0.33

The correlation between PGR and MAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PGR:

$19.23

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

PGR:

10.56

MAR:

31.80

PEG Ratio

PGR:

0.08

MAR:

0.83

PS Ratio

PGR:

1.36

MAR:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

PGR:

$87.65B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PGR:

$23.23B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

PGR:

$14.81B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGR vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PGR
PGR Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGR Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PGR vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGRMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.35

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

4.31

-5.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.23

10.89

-12.12

PGR vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGR Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGR and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGR vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.06%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGRMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.06%

-75.59%

+4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.30%

-12.65%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.35%

-30.50%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.35%

-30.50%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.35%

-61.26%

+30.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.70%

0.00%

-25.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-14.90%

+0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.96%

5.01%

+10.95%

Volatility

PGR vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.92%. This indicates that PGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGRMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.54%

6.92%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.87%

19.94%

-3.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.55%

26.32%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.55%

28.84%

-4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.48%

32.90%

-8.42%

Dividends

PGR vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.84%, more than MAR's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.68%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%
PGR
The Progressive Corporation
6.84%2.15%0.48%0.25%0.31%6.23%2.68%3.89%1.86%1.21%2.50%2.16%

Financials

PGR vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
22.74B
1.81B
(PGR) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PGR and MAR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGR has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGR dropped -71.06% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGR and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer