PGR vs. AFL
Compare and contrast key facts about The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PGR or AFL.
Correlation
The correlation between PGR and AFL is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
PGR vs. AFL - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PGR:
1.83
AFL:
1.77
PGR:
2.65
AFL:
2.35
PGR:
1.32
AFL:
1.33
PGR:
3.63
AFL:
2.74
PGR:
8.88
AFL:
6.75
PGR:
4.45%
AFL:
5.09%
PGR:
21.59%
AFL:
19.39%
PGR:
-71.05%
AFL:
-82.71%
PGR:
-1.45%
AFL:
-2.06%
Fundamentals
PGR:
$168.25B
AFL:
$60.99B
PGR:
$14.40
AFL:
$9.63
PGR:
19.93
AFL:
11.60
PGR:
0.13
AFL:
0.93
PGR:
$57.75B
AFL:
$13.69B
PGR:
$37.47B
AFL:
$13.69B
PGR:
$8.12B
AFL:
$4.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGR achieves a 22.16% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PGR has outperformed AFL with an annualized return of 29.85%, while AFL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.08% annualized return.
PGR
22.16%
1.35%
16.03%
39.00%
33.26%
29.85%
AFL
8.64%
3.86%
-0.57%
33.92%
31.37%
16.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PGR vs. AFL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
PGR
AFL
PGR vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Progressive Corporation (PGR) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PGR vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison
PGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than AFL's 1.86% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 1.67% | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 5.53% |
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.86% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% |
Drawdowns
PGR vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGR drawdown since its inception was -71.05%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGR and AFL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PGR vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison
The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 4.37%. This indicates that PGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
PGR vs. AFL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Progressive Corporation and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities