PFUT vs. GDMA

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PFUT (Putnam Sustainable Future ETF) and GDMA (Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PFUT is a Sustainable fund actively managed by Power Corporation of Canada, while GDMA is a Hedge Fund fund actively managed by Gadsden. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFUT charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GDMA.

Performance

PFUT vs. GDMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PFUT

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDMA

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -1.10%
• 6M: 1.90%
• YTD: 7.92%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: 15.56%
• 5Y*: 8.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFUT vs. GDMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	2.26%	2.22%	13.60%	29.98%	-33.60%	0.60%
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	7.92%	25.29%	7.44%	1.72%	-2.08%	-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between PFUT and GDMA is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021	0.27

Over the past year, PFUT and GDMA have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

PFUT vs. GDMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFUT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GDMA

GDMA Risk / Return Rank: 56
GDMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
GDMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
GDMA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
GDMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GDMA Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFUT vs. GDMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Sustainable Future ETF (PFUT) and Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFUT	GDMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.40	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.86	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.32	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	PFUT	GDMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-16.66%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.53%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-7.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-12.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.53%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-3.78%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PFUT	GDMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	15.79%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	10.34%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	11.41%	—

PFUT vs. GDMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFUT has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMA's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFUT vs. GDMA - Dividend Comparison

PFUT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
GDMA Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF	2.59%	2.79%	2.32%	4.14%	1.18%	2.10%	0.62%	3.17%
PFUT Putnam Sustainable Future ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFUT and GDMA in my portfolio?

PFUT and GDMA have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PFUT or GDMA?

On fees, PFUT is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PFUT or GDMA?

PFUT is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GDMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PFUT or GDMA?

GDMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for PFUT.

What is the main difference between PFUT and GDMA?

PFUT is categorized as Sustainable, while GDMA is Hedge Fund. They also come from different issuers: Power Corporation of Canada and Gadsden. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for PFUT and 0.77% for GDMA.