PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFTSX vs. PFSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PFTSX
PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund
-3.17%12.31%6.02%10.07%-12.97%6.29%11.27%
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
-3.74%12.09%20.94%14.51%-17.25%17.56%32.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTSX achieves a -3.17% return, which is significantly higher than PFSMX's -3.74% return.


PFTSX

1D
0.10%
1M
-5.54%
YTD
-3.17%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
8.19%
3Y*
6.89%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*

PFSMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-7.98%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-3.23%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFTSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFSMX's 2.05% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFTSX vs. PFSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFTSX
PFTSX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PFTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PFTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PFSMX
PFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFTSXPFSMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

0.61

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

0.94

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

0.65

+0.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

3.09

+2.12

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the PFSMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTSX and PFSMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFTSXPFSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.61

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.36

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.41

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between PFTSX and PFSMX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Dividend Comparison

PFTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than PFSMX's 9.89% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFTSX
PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund
1.81%1.75%2.43%2.22%0.89%13.53%2.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
9.89%9.52%17.36%3.15%20.83%20.75%3.02%1.39%1.72%0.80%

Drawdowns

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTSX drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, smaller than the maximum PFSMX drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTSX and PFSMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFTSXPFSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-38.00%

+11.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.80%

-11.61%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-38.00%

+11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.63%

-8.16%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.05%

-10.91%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.40%

2.44%

-1.04%

Volatility

PFTSX vs. PFSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) is 2.87%, while PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that PFTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFTSXPFSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.87%

4.02%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.58%

8.03%

-3.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

15.00%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

19.41%

-8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.54%

19.49%

-8.95%