PFTSX vs. PFDOX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX).

PFTSX is managed by The Pacific Financial Group. It was launched on Apr 30, 2020. PFDOX is managed by The Pacific Financial Group. It was launched on Dec 10, 2017.

Performance

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PFTSX PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund	-1.68%	12.31%	6.02%	10.07%	-12.97%	6.29%	11.27%
PFDOX PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund	-0.92%	7.49%	2.02%	5.41%	-13.51%	-1.65%	6.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFTSX achieves a -1.68% return, which is significantly lower than PFDOX's -0.92% return.

PFTSX

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -3.56%
• YTD: -1.68%
• 6M: -0.61%
• 1Y: 9.52%
• 3Y*: 7.44%
• 5Y*: 3.03%
• 10Y*: —

PFDOX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -2.05%
• YTD: -0.92%
• 6M: 0.22%
• 1Y: 3.51%
• 3Y*: 3.87%
• 5Y*: -0.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PFTSX and PFDOX have an expense ratio of 2.03%.

PFTSX

PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund

PFDOX

PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund

Return for Risk

PFTSX vs. PFDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFTSX

PFTSX Risk / Return Rank: 60
PFTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
PFTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
PFTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
PFTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PFDOX

PFDOX Risk / Return Rank: 30
PFDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PFDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
PFDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PFDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PFDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PFTSX	PFDOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	0.90	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	1.27	+0.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.17	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.60	1.10	+0.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.51	3.98	+2.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the PFDOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFTSX and PFDOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PFTSX	PFDOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	0.90	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	-0.02	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	0.18	+0.29

Correlation

The correlation between PFTSX and PFDOX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Dividend Comparison

PFTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than PFDOX's 2.82% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PFTSX PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund	1.78%	1.75%	2.43%	2.22%	0.89%	13.53%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFDOX PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund	2.82%	2.79%	3.36%	2.91%	3.13%	3.66%	2.68%	2.29%	0.92%	0.18%

Drawdowns

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFTSX drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, which is greater than PFDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTSX and PFDOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFTSX	PFDOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.39%	-19.45%	-6.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.80%	-3.40%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.39%	-19.45%	-6.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.17%	-4.27%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.05%	-6.05%	-4.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.43%	0.94%	+0.49%

Volatility

PFTSX vs. PFDOX - Volatility Comparison

PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PFTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFTSX	PFDOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.37%	1.93%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.83%	2.56%	+2.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.96%	4.05%	+3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.02%	5.67%	+5.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.55%	4.85%	+5.70%