PFTSX vs. PFADX
PFTSX (PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund) and PFADX (PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - PFTSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group, while PFADX is a Global Allocation fund managed by The Pacific Financial Group. Over the past 5 years, PFTSX returned 4.01%/yr vs 1.34%/yr for PFADX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFTSX charges 2.03%/yr vs 2.05%/yr for PFADX.
Performance
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFTSX achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than PFADX's 2.67% return.
PFTSX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 4.72%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 4.01%
- 10Y*
- —
PFADX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 2.67%
- 6M
- 2.56%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFTSX PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund | 4.93% | 12.31% | 6.02% | 10.07% | -12.97% | 6.29% | 11.27% |
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 2.67% | 7.07% | 2.13% | 3.69% | -9.50% | 3.85% | 10.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFTSX and PFADX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2020 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PFTSX and PFADX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFTSX vs. PFADX — Risk / Return Rank
PFTSX
PFADX
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) and PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PFTSX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.34 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.20 | +0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 7.26 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFTSX drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, which is greater than PFADX's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFTSX and PFADX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFTSX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -16.64% | -9.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.72% | -3.63% | -2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.04% | -6.38% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.39% | -16.64% | -9.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -1.67% | +1.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.71% | -5.27% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.29% | 1.10% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Volatility Comparison
PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund (PFTSX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund (PFADX) at 1.62%. This indicates that PFTSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFADX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFTSX | PFADX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 1.62% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.85% | 3.65% | +2.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.86% | 4.45% | +2.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.12% | 5.88% | +5.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.50% | 5.54% | +4.96% |
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFTSX has a 2.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PFADX's 2.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFTSX vs. PFADX - Dividend Comparison
PFTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than PFADX's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFADX PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund | 2.40% | 2.46% | 2.89% | 1.04% | 5.33% | 3.46% | 0.08% | 1.51% | 0.91% | 0.52% |
PFTSX PFG Tactical Income Strategy Fund | 1.67% | 1.75% | 2.43% | 2.22% | 0.89% | 13.53% | 2.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFTSX and PFADX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PFTSX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to PFADX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFTSX dropped -26.39% vs PFADX's -16.64%.
PFTSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFTSX and PFADX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer