PFSMX vs. GQFPX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PFSMX (PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund) and GQFPX (GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 3 years, PFSMX returned 15.44%/yr vs 12.57%/yr for GQFPX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFSMX charges 2.05%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GQFPX.

Performance

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSMX achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly higher than GQFPX's 6.17% return.

PFSMX

• 1D: 0.60%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 7.70%
• 6M: 7.11%
• 1Y: 15.17%
• 3Y*: 15.44%
• 5Y*: 8.32%
• 10Y*: —

GQFPX

• 1D: -1.22%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 6.17%
• 6M: 7.16%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund	7.70%	12.09%	20.94%	14.51%	-17.25%	5.26%
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	6.17%	19.29%	4.81%	15.09%	-1.13%	5.03%

Correlation

The correlation between PFSMX and GQFPX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between PFSMX and GQFPX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PFSMX vs. GQFPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSMX

PFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 28
PFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

GQFPX

GQFPX Risk / Return Rank: 27
GQFPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
GQFPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
GQFPX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
GQFPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
GQFPX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PFSMX	GQFPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	1.35	0.00
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.91	+0.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.23	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.12	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.51	6.42	+1.09

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is comparable to the GQFPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSMX and GQFPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than GQFPX's maximum drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSMX and GQFPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PFSMX	GQFPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-16.95%	-21.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.16%	-6.25%	-1.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.29%	-10.57%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.69%	-6.25%	+5.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.64%	-3.02%	-7.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	2.05%	-0.06%

Volatility

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Volatility Comparison

PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQFPX) at 3.41%. This indicates that PFSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQFPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PFSMX	GQFPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.41%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.87%	8.05%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.14%	9.82%	+1.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.50%	12.83%	+6.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.35%	12.83%	+6.52%

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSMX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than GQFPX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

PFSMX vs. GQFPX - Dividend Comparison

PFSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%, more than GQFPX's 6.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GQFPX GQG Partners Global Quality Dividend Income Fund	6.01%	5.32%	3.71%	3.69%	5.18%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFSMX PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund	8.84%	9.52%	17.36%	3.15%	20.83%	20.75%	3.02%	1.39%	1.72%	0.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PFSMX and GQFPX in my portfolio?

PFSMX and GQFPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PFSMX or GQFPX?

PFSMX has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to GQFPX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFSMX dropped -38.00% vs GQFPX's -16.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GQFPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.