PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFSMX vs. PFDOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
-3.74%12.09%20.94%14.51%-17.25%17.56%11.48%27.08%-8.20%0.10%
PFDOX
PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund
-1.27%7.49%2.02%5.41%-13.51%-1.65%5.76%6.10%-1.92%0.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFSMX achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly lower than PFDOX's -1.27% return.


PFSMX

1D
-0.22%
1M
-7.98%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
-3.23%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
12.76%
5Y*
6.94%
10Y*

PFDOX

1D
0.59%
1M
-2.83%
YTD
-1.27%
6M
0.10%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
3.75%
5Y*
-0.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFSMX has a 2.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PFDOX's 2.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PFSMX vs. PFDOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFSMX
PFSMX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PFSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PFSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

PFDOX
PFDOX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PFDOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFDOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFDOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PFDOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFDOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) and PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFSMXPFDOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.94

1.19

-0.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.15

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.65

1.18

-0.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.09

4.30

-1.21

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFSMX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the PFDOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFSMX and PFDOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFSMXPFDOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

-0.02

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.17

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PFSMX and PFDOX is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Dividend Comparison

PFSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.89%, more than PFDOX's 2.83% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFSMX
PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund
9.89%9.52%17.36%3.15%20.83%20.75%3.02%1.39%1.72%0.80%
PFDOX
PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund
2.83%2.79%3.36%2.91%3.13%3.66%2.68%2.29%0.92%0.18%

Drawdowns

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFSMX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than PFDOX's maximum drawdown of -19.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFSMX and PFDOX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFSMXPFDOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-19.45%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.61%

-3.40%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-19.45%

-18.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.16%

-4.60%

-3.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-6.05%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

0.93%

+1.51%

Volatility

PFSMX vs. PFDOX - Volatility Comparison

PFG MFS Aggressive Growth Strategy Fund (PFSMX) has a higher volatility of 4.02% compared to PFG Active Core Bond Strategy Fund (PFDOX) at 1.90%. This indicates that PFSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFDOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFSMXPFDOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

1.90%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.03%

2.54%

+5.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.00%

4.04%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

5.67%

+13.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.49%

4.85%

+14.64%