PECO vs. SMH
PECO (Phillips Edison & Company, Inc.) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 3 years, PECO returned 12.12%/yr vs 63.96%/yr for SMH. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PECO vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PECO achieves a 11.74% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 74.25% return.
PECO
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -1.66%
- YTD
- 11.74%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 14.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- 20.06%
- YTD
- 74.25%
- 6M
- 74.08%
- 1Y
- 150.04%
- 3Y*
- 63.96%
- 5Y*
- 38.76%
- 10Y*
- 37.49%
PECO vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 11.74% | -1.59% | 6.20% | 18.53% | -0.33% | 20.40% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 74.25% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 23.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between PECO and SMH is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2021 | 0.19 |
The correlation between PECO and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PECO vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
PECO
SMH
PECO vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PECO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.69 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 10.11 | -8.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.89 | 38.76 | -34.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PECO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 | 4.94 | -4.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.11 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.34 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PECO vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PECO drawdown since its inception was -23.11%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PECO and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PECO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.11% | -84.96% | +61.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | -14.93% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.78% | -35.74% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -1.63% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -41.08% | +34.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.89% | -0.27% |
Volatility
PECO vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. (PECO) is 4.61%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that PECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PECO | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.61% | 11.58% | -6.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.65% | 24.35% | -13.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.24% | 30.57% | -15.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 35.01% | -12.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.57% | 32.57% | -10.00% |
Dividends
PECO vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
PECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PECO Phillips Edison & Company, Inc. | 3.27% | 3.52% | 3.18% | 3.12% | 3.43% | 1.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PECO and SMH have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to PECO (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PECO dropped -23.11% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.94 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PECO and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer