PortfoliosLab logo
SMH vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SMH and QQQ is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.7

Performance

SMH vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%900.00%1,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
737.36%
501.77%
SMH
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SMH:

0.08

QQQ:

0.49

Sortino Ratio

SMH:

0.41

QQQ:

0.85

Omega Ratio

SMH:

1.05

QQQ:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

SMH:

0.09

QQQ:

0.54

Martin Ratio

SMH:

0.23

QQQ:

1.86

Ulcer Index

SMH:

14.44%

QQQ:

6.59%

Daily Std Dev

SMH:

43.06%

QQQ:

25.26%

Max Drawdown

SMH:

-83.29%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

SMH:

-25.38%

QQQ:

-13.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a -13.71% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's -8.45% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 23.59%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively lower 16.49% annualized return.


SMH

YTD

-13.71%

1M

-9.01%

6M

-16.06%

1Y

0.89%

5Y*

26.90%

10Y*

23.59%

QQQ

YTD

-8.45%

1M

-5.29%

6M

-4.78%

1Y

10.24%

5Y*

17.72%

10Y*

16.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMH vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for SMH: current value is 0.35%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SMH: 0.35%
Expense ratio chart for QQQ: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQ: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

SMH vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SMH is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SMH is 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SMH is 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SMH is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SMH is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SMH is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SMH vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for SMH, currently valued at 0.08, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
SMH: 0.08
QQQ: 0.49
The chart of Sortino ratio for SMH, currently valued at 0.41, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
SMH: 0.41
QQQ: 0.85
The chart of Omega ratio for SMH, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
SMH: 1.05
QQQ: 1.12
The chart of Calmar ratio for SMH, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
SMH: 0.09
QQQ: 0.54
The chart of Martin ratio for SMH, currently valued at 0.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
SMH: 0.23
QQQ: 1.86

The current SMH Sharpe Ratio is 0.08, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMH and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.08
0.49
SMH
QQQ

Dividends

SMH vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than QQQ's 0.64% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
SMH
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF
0.51%0.44%0.60%1.18%0.51%0.69%1.50%1.88%1.43%0.80%2.14%1.16%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.64%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

SMH vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -83.29%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-25.38%
-13.25%
SMH
QQQ

Volatility

SMH vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 24.06% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 16.89%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
24.06%
16.89%
SMH
QQQ