SMH vs. XLK
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK).
SMH and XLK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. XLK is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Technology Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both SMH and XLK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SMH or XLK.
Performance
SMH vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SMH achieves a 38.70% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 20.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SMH has outperformed XLK with an annualized return of 28.01%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively lower 20.26% annualized return.
SMH
38.70%
-4.07%
2.51%
50.18%
33.07%
28.01%
XLK
20.71%
-0.37%
7.81%
26.58%
22.92%
20.26%
Key characteristics
| SMH | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.39 | 1.18 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.90 | 1.64 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.22 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.93 | 1.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.19 | 5.19 |
| Ulcer Index | 9.24% | 4.92% |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.45% | 21.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -95.73% | -82.05% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.77% | -2.65% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SMH vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
SMH has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.13% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between SMH and XLK is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SMH vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SMH vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than XLK's 0.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.43% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
XLK Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.67% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% | 1.75% | 1.70% |
Drawdowns
SMH vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SMH drawdown since its inception was -95.73%, which is greater than XLK's maximum drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMH and XLK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SMH vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) at 6.36%. This indicates that SMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.