PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TATT vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TATT vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tat Techno (TATT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than AVGO's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TATT has underperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 20.82%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively higher 41.81% annualized return.


TATT

1D
-0.62%
1M
17.01%
YTD
-2.88%
6M
-0.97%
1Y
60.06%
3Y*
78.16%
5Y*
49.59%
10Y*
20.82%

AVGO

1D
-3.06%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.23%
1Y
50.90%
3Y*
68.61%
5Y*
54.78%
10Y*
41.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TATT vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TATT
Tat Techno
-2.88%73.91%153.00%91.51%-16.00%39.28%-10.30%-17.89%-41.43%23.44%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.24%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TATT and AVGO is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.12

Over the past year, TATT and AVGO have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TATT:

$572.74M

AVGO:

$1.85T

EPS

TATT:

$1.29

AVGO:

$6.01

PE Ratio

TATT:

33.73

AVGO:

63.26

PEG Ratio

TATT:

0.25

AVGO:

0.78

PS Ratio

TATT:

3.13

AVGO:

24.57

PB Ratio

TATT:

3.17

AVGO:

21.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATT:

$177.02M

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATT:

$44.18M

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

TATT:

$22.13M

AVGO:

$42.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TATT vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATT
TATT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATT vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TATTAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

1.78

-0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.19

4.04

-0.85

TATT vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATT Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATT and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TATT vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TATTAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-48.30%

-48.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.50%

-28.67%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.50%

-41.15%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-41.15%

-6.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.11%

-48.30%

-26.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.02%

-20.94%

-8.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.99%

-8.00%

-57.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.90%

12.64%

+6.26%

Volatility

TATT vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tat Techno (TATT) is 20.17%, while Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) has a volatility of 21.76%. This indicates that TATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TATTAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.17%

21.76%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.11%

33.46%

+16.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.51%

46.50%

+17.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.29%

43.63%

+9.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.77%

39.60%

+10.17%

Dividends

TATT vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

TATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.67%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%3.88%0.00%

Financials

TATT vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tat Techno and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
41.15M
22.19B
(TATT) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TATT vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tat Techno and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
24.4%
67.2%
Portfolio components
TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 10.03M and revenue of 41.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 2.99M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 3.40M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TATT and AVGO have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGO has higher volatility (21.76%) compared to TATT (20.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATT dropped -97.07% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AVGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TATT and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer