PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TATT vs. BKKT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TATT vs. BKKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tat Techno (TATT) and Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly higher than BKKT's -11.16% return.


TATT

1D
6.10%
1M
22.48%
YTD
-4.12%
6M
6.49%
1Y
60.71%
3Y*
86.27%
5Y*
49.10%
10Y*
20.56%

BKKT

1D
-8.98%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
-11.16%
6M
-39.20%
1Y
-33.13%
3Y*
-37.48%
5Y*
-48.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TATT vs. BKKT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TATT
Tat Techno
-4.12%73.91%153.00%91.51%-16.00%39.28%-0.17%
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
-11.16%-59.47%-55.57%87.39%-86.02%-15.58%-8.36%

Correlation

The correlation between TATT and BKKT is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2020

0.16

The correlation between TATT and BKKT shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (5 years) to 0.27 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

TATT:

$1.29

BKKT:

-$18.68

PS Ratio

TATT:

3.09

BKKT:

0.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATT:

$177.02M

BKKT:

$1.28B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATT:

$44.18M

BKKT:

$470.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

TATT:

$22.13M

BKKT:

-$124.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TATT vs. BKKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATT
TATT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BKKT
BKKT Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BKKT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKKT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKKT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BKKT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKKT Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATT vs. BKKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TATTBKKTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.86

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.09

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

-0.39

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.41

-0.53

+3.95

TATT vs. BKKT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATT Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the BKKT Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATT and BKKT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TATTBKKTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

-0.22

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

-0.26

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

-0.25

+0.34

Drawdowns

TATT vs. BKKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum BKKT drawdown of -99.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and BKKT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TATTBKKTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-99.41%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.50%

-84.57%

+37.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.50%

-89.36%

+41.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.50%

-99.41%

+51.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.92%

-99.16%

+69.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.05%

-84.77%

+18.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.83%

62.11%

-44.28%

Volatility

TATT vs. BKKT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tat Techno (TATT) is 25.05%, while Bakkt Holdings, Inc. (BKKT) has a volatility of 36.58%. This indicates that TATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKKT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TATTBKKTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.05%

36.58%

-11.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.04%

79.89%

-31.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.66%

149.42%

-87.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.89%

189.49%

-136.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.52%

183.20%

-133.68%

Dividends

TATT vs. BKKT - Dividend Comparison

Neither TATT nor BKKT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BKKT
Bakkt Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%3.88%

Financials

TATT vs. BKKT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tat Techno and Bakkt Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
41.15M
0
(TATT) Total Revenue
(BKKT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TATT and BKKT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BKKT has higher volatility (36.58%) compared to TATT (25.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATT dropped -97.07% vs BKKT's -99.41%.

TATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TATT and BKKT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer