TATT vs. VST
TATT (Tat Techno) and VST (Vistra Corp.) are both stocks. TATT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities). Over the past 5 years, TATT returned 49.10%/yr vs 57.73%/yr for VST. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TATT vs. VST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly higher than VST's -4.54% return.
TATT
- 1D
- 6.10%
- 1M
- 22.48%
- YTD
- -4.12%
- 6M
- 6.49%
- 1Y
- 60.71%
- 3Y*
- 86.27%
- 5Y*
- 49.10%
- 10Y*
- 20.56%
VST
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -4.38%
- YTD
- -4.54%
- 6M
- -10.15%
- 1Y
- -12.17%
- 3Y*
- 86.20%
- 5Y*
- 57.73%
- 10Y*
- —
TATT vs. VST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATT Tat Techno | -4.12% | 73.91% | 153.00% | 91.51% | -16.00% | 39.28% | -10.30% | -17.89% | -41.43% | 23.44% |
VST Vistra Corp. | -4.54% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 24.95% | 18.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between TATT and VST is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2016 | 0.10 |
The correlation between TATT and VST shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TATT:
$1.29
VST:
$8.60
TATT:
33.30
VST:
17.87
TATT:
0.25
VST:
0.41
TATT:
3.09
VST:
2.28
TATT:
$177.02M
VST:
$17.20B
TATT:
$44.18M
VST:
$1.12B
TATT:
$22.13M
VST:
$4.34B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TATT vs. VST — Risk / Return Rank
TATT
VST
TATT vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TATT | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.00 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.32 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.41 | -0.61 | +4.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TATT | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 | -0.25 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 1.21 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.73 | -0.64 |
Drawdowns
TATT vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and VST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TATT | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -53.32% | -43.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.50% | -38.01% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.50% | -48.80% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -48.80% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.92% | -29.23% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.05% | -13.67% | -52.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.83% | 20.03% | -2.20% |
Volatility
TATT vs. VST - Volatility Comparison
Tat Techno (TATT) has a higher volatility of 25.05% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 14.51%. This indicates that TATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TATT | VST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.05% | 14.51% | +10.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.04% | 37.45% | +10.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.66% | 48.50% | +13.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.89% | 47.86% | +5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.52% | 42.19% | +7.33% |
Dividends
TATT vs. VST - Dividend Comparison
TATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATT Tat Techno | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.24% | 3.88% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Financials
TATT vs. VST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tat Techno and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TATT vs. VST - Profitability Comparison
TATT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 10.03M and revenue of 41.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TATT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 2.99M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
TATT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 3.40M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TATT and VST have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TATT has higher volatility (25.05%) compared to VST (14.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATT dropped -97.07% vs VST's -53.32%.
TATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TATT and VST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer