PortfoliosLab logo
TATT vs. VST
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between TATT and VST is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

TATT vs. VST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tat Techno (TATT) and Vistra Corp. (VST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TATT:

1.19

VST:

0.72

Sortino Ratio

TATT:

1.86

VST:

1.33

Omega Ratio

TATT:

1.24

VST:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

TATT:

2.75

VST:

1.07

Martin Ratio

TATT:

7.04

VST:

2.39

Ulcer Index

TATT:

10.16%

VST:

21.96%

Daily Std Dev

TATT:

60.53%

VST:

74.82%

Max Drawdown

TATT:

-97.34%

VST:

-53.32%

Current Drawdown

TATT:

-26.07%

VST:

-16.18%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TATT:

$340.31M

VST:

$54.20B

EPS

TATT:

$1.03

VST:

$6.31

PE Ratio

TATT:

26.68

VST:

25.31

PEG Ratio

TATT:

0.00

VST:

4.53

PS Ratio

TATT:

2.12

VST:

2.99

PB Ratio

TATT:

2.58

VST:

23.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

TATT:

$160.17M

VST:

$18.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

TATT:

$35.90M

VST:

$7.48B

EBITDA (TTM)

TATT:

$14.31M

VST:

$6.78B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a 1.36% return, which is significantly lower than VST's 16.67% return.


TATT

YTD

1.36%

1M

-8.54%

6M

14.28%

1Y

71.31%

3Y*

63.92%

5Y*

47.25%

10Y*

17.06%

VST

YTD

16.67%

1M

23.87%

6M

0.79%

1Y

53.66%

3Y*

86.47%

5Y*

54.80%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Tat Techno

Vistra Corp.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TATT vs. VST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TATT is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TATT is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TATT is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TATT is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TATT is 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TATT is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VST is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VST is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VST is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VST is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VST is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VST is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TATT vs. VST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TATT Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the VST Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATT and VST, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

TATT vs. VST - Dividend Comparison

TATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TATT
Tat Techno
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.24%19.03%0.00%3.40%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.55%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TATT vs. VST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than VST's maximum drawdown of -53.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and VST.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

TATT vs. VST - Volatility Comparison

Tat Techno (TATT) has a higher volatility of 22.15% compared to Vistra Corp. (VST) at 14.09%. This indicates that TATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

TATT vs. VST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tat Techno and Vistra Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
42.14M
3.93B
(TATT) Total Revenue
(VST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TATT vs. VST - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tat Techno and Vistra Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
23.6%
20.2%
(TATT) Gross Margin
(VST) Gross Margin
TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 9.95M and revenue of 42.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.

VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 793.00M and revenue of 3.93B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.2%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 4.17M and revenue of 42.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of -120.00M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.1%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Tat Techno reported a net income of 3.81M and revenue of 42.14M, resulting in a net margin of 9.1%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of -268.00M and revenue of 3.93B, resulting in a net margin of -6.8%.