TATT vs. SMH
TATT (Tat Techno) is a stock, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) is Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Over the past 10 years, TATT returned 17.84%/yr vs 34.16%/yr for SMH. Their 0.13 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TATT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -12.90% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 50.09% return. Over the past 10 years, TATT has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 17.84%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 34.16% annualized return.
TATT
- 1D
- -4.63%
- 1M
- -18.28%
- 6M
- -23.55%
- YTD
- -12.90%
- 1Y
- 13.15%
- 3Y*
- 74.19%
- 5Y*
- 43.87%
- 10Y*
- 17.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.12%
SMH
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -8.74%
- 6M
- 33.97%
- YTD
- 50.09%
- 1Y
- 90.95%
- 3Y*
- 50.56%
- 5Y*
- 33.46%
- 10Y*
- 34.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.28B | $7.64B | $7.07B | |
TATT Tat Techno | $6.11M | $6.31M | $8.80M |
TATT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TATT Tat Techno | -12.90% | 73.91% | 153.00% | 91.51% | -16.00% | 39.28% | -10.30% | -17.89% | -41.43% | 23.44% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 50.09% | 49.17% | 39.10% | 73.38% | -33.53% | 42.13% | 55.53% | 64.45% | -9.05% | 38.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between TATT and SMH is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2000 | 0.13 |
Over the past year, TATT and SMH have become more correlated (0.42) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TATT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
TATT
SMH
TATT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TATT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.36 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.27 | 3.58 | -3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.61 | 14.64 | -14.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TATT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TATT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -84.96% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.50% | -24.62% | -22.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.50% | -35.74% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.50% | -45.30% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.11% | -45.30% | -29.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.34% | -19.19% | -17.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.87% | -40.89% | -24.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.21% | 6.01% | +15.20% |
Volatility
TATT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tat Techno (TATT) is 12.89%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that TATT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TATT | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.89% | 14.70% | -1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.71% | 33.13% | +17.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.90% | 38.57% | +25.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.80% | 36.50% | +13.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.80% | 33.32% | +16.48% |
Dividends
TATT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
TATT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.20% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
TATT Tat Techno | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.24% | 3.88% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TATT and SMH have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SMH has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to TATT (12.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATT dropped -97.07% vs SMH's -84.96%.
SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TATT and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer