TATT vs. KTOS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TATT (Tat Techno) and KTOS (Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Aerospace & Defense industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, TATT returned 20.56%/yr vs 30.31%/yr for KTOS. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TATT vs. KTOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tat Techno (TATT) and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TATT achieves a -4.12% return, which is significantly higher than KTOS's -23.03% return. Over the past 10 years, TATT has underperformed KTOS with an annualized return of 20.56%, while KTOS has yielded a comparatively higher 30.31% annualized return.

TATT

• 1D: 6.10%
• 1M: 22.48%
• YTD: -4.12%
• 6M: 6.49%
• 1Y: 60.71%
• 3Y*: 86.27%
• 5Y*: 49.10%
• 10Y*: 20.56%

KTOS

• 1D: -7.65%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -23.03%
• 6M: -19.72%
• 1Y: 49.48%
• 3Y*: 61.51%
• 5Y*: 17.61%
• 10Y*: 30.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TATT vs. KTOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TATT Tat Techno	-4.12%	73.91%	153.00%	91.51%	-16.00%	39.28%	-10.30%	-17.89%	-41.43%	23.44%
KTOS Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.	-23.03%	187.76%	30.01%	96.61%	-46.80%	-29.27%	52.30%	27.82%	33.05%	43.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TATT and KTOS is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 1999	0.09

Over the past year, TATT and KTOS have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TATT : $565.41M KTOS : $10.48B
EPS TATT : $1.29 KTOS : $0.17
PE Ratio TATT : 33.30 KTOS : 339.30
PEG Ratio TATT : 0.25 KTOS : 3.94
PS Ratio TATT : 3.09 KTOS : 7.05
PB Ratio TATT : 3.13 KTOS : 3.07
Total Revenue (TTM) TATT : $177.02M KTOS : $1.42B
Gross Profit (TTM) TATT : $44.18M KTOS : $259.40M
EBITDA (TTM) TATT : $22.13M KTOS : $78.30M

Return for Risk

TATT vs. KTOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TATT

TATT Risk / Return Rank: 68
TATT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
TATT Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TATT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
TATT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
TATT Martin Ratio Rank: 68

KTOS

KTOS Risk / Return Rank: 60
KTOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
KTOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
KTOS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KTOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
KTOS Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TATT vs. KTOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tat Techno (TATT) and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TATT	KTOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.70	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.60	1.39	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.17	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.83	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.41	1.75	+1.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TATT vs. KTOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TATT Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the KTOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TATT and KTOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TATT	KTOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.70	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93	0.34	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.60	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	-0.14	+0.22

Drawdowns

TATT vs. KTOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TATT drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum KTOS drawdown of -99.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TATT and KTOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	TATT	KTOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.07%	-99.81%	+2.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.50%	-60.15%	+12.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.50%	-60.15%	+12.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.50%	-69.39%	+21.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-75.11%	-72.74%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.92%	-96.30%	+66.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-66.05%	-95.94%	+29.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.83%	28.43%	-10.60%

Volatility

TATT vs. KTOS - Volatility Comparison

Tat Techno (TATT) has a higher volatility of 25.05% compared to Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) at 22.95%. This indicates that TATT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KTOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TATT	KTOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.05%	22.95%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.04%	55.83%	-7.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.66%	70.96%	-9.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.89%	51.97%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.52%	50.65%	-1.13%

Dividends

TATT vs. KTOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither TATT nor KTOS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
KTOS Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TATT Tat Techno	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.24%	3.88%

Financials

TATT vs. KTOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Tat Techno and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TATT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a gross profit of 10.03M and revenue of 41.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

KTOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.70M and revenue of 371.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.4%.

TATT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported an operating income of 2.99M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.

KTOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.70M and revenue of 371.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.3%.

TATT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tat Techno reported a net income of 3.40M and revenue of 41.15M, resulting in a net margin of 8.3%.

KTOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. reported a net income of 11.90M and revenue of 371.00M, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TATT and KTOS in my portfolio?

TATT and KTOS have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TATT or KTOS?

TATT has higher volatility (25.05%) compared to KTOS (22.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TATT dropped -97.07% vs KTOS's -99.81%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TATT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.