PAVE vs. MNST
PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 14.70%/yr for MNST. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PAVE vs. MNST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PAVE having a 20.86% return and MNST slightly higher at 21.08%.
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 8.17%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
PAVE vs. MNST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.08% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 35.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAVE and MNST is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PAVE and MNST has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAVE vs. MNST — Risk / Return Rank
PAVE
MNST
PAVE vs. MNST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAVE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.11 | 2.60 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.32 | 7.37 | +3.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAVE vs. MNST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum MNST drawdown of -69.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and MNST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAVE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.08% | -69.17% | +25.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.91% | -17.70% | +5.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.23% | -26.04% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.23% | -26.62% | +0.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | 0.00% | -1.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.23% | -20.66% | +14.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 6.22% | -2.95% |
Volatility
PAVE vs. MNST - Volatility Comparison
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) has a higher volatility of 7.35% compared to Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) at 5.50%. This indicates that PAVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAVE | MNST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.35% | 5.50% | +1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.87% | 20.03% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 26.43% | -6.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.70% | 24.60% | -2.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.40% | 26.25% | -1.85% |
Dividends
PAVE vs. MNST - Dividend Comparison
PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, while MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAVE and MNST have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAVE has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs MNST's -69.17%.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAVE and MNST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer