PAVE vs. FANG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index, while FANG (Diamondback Energy, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, PAVE returned 17.84%/yr vs 22.17%/yr for FANG. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PAVE vs. FANG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAVE achieves a 20.86% return, which is significantly lower than FANG's 29.28% return.

PAVE

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.64%
• YTD: 20.86%
• 6M: 18.50%
• 1Y: 38.94%
• 3Y*: 25.14%
• 5Y*: 17.84%
• 10Y*: —

FANG

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: 29.28%
• 6M: 24.04%
• 1Y: 27.23%
• 3Y*: 18.15%
• 5Y*: 22.17%
• 10Y*: 10.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAVE vs. FANG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	20.86%	19.36%	17.92%	31.01%	-7.17%	36.42%	19.72%	33.26%	-19.15%	13.41%
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	29.28%	-5.64%	10.35%	19.66%	35.34%	127.51%	-46.00%	0.92%	-26.35%	20.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PAVE and FANG is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between PAVE and FANG has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PAVE vs. FANG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAVE

PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 67
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

FANG

FANG Risk / Return Rank: 73
FANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FANG Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FANG Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAVE vs. FANG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) and Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAVE	FANG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.02	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	1.52	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.18	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	2.56	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.32	4.99	+6.33

PAVE vs. FANG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the FANG Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAVE and FANG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAVE vs. FANG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAVE drawdown since its inception was -44.08%, smaller than the maximum FANG drawdown of -88.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAVE and FANG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAVE	FANG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.08%	-88.72%	+44.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-12.53%	+0.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.23%	-42.10%	+15.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.23%	-42.10%	+15.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-88.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-9.59%	+8.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.23%	-19.37%	+13.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.27%	6.43%	-3.16%

Volatility

PAVE vs. FANG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) is 7.35%, while Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) has a volatility of 11.03%. This indicates that PAVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FANG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAVE	FANG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.35%	11.03%	-3.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.87%	24.10%	-8.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.49%	31.48%	-11.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.70%	37.99%	-16.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.40%	49.05%	-24.65%

Dividends

PAVE vs. FANG - Dividend Comparison

PAVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than FANG's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FANG Diamondback Energy, Inc.	2.16%	2.66%	5.06%	5.15%	6.55%	1.62%	3.10%	0.74%	0.40%	0.00%
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF	0.76%	0.92%	0.54%	0.68%	0.84%	0.48%	0.44%	0.67%	0.78%	0.30%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAVE and FANG in my portfolio?

PAVE and FANG have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAVE or FANG?

FANG has higher volatility (11.03%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAVE dropped -44.08% vs FANG's -88.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.