PALDX vs. SDMZX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX).
PALDX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. SDMZX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 23, 2013.
Performance
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | -3.62% | 13.62% | 18.96% | 18.90% | -15.65% | 16.30% | 10.68% | 22.27% | -4.12% | 5.95% |
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund | -0.26% | 6.18% | 5.64% | 6.25% | -4.82% | -0.19% | 3.97% | 7.92% | 0.95% | 0.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALDX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than SDMZX's -0.26% return.
PALDX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -5.44%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 12.43%
- 3Y*
- 13.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
SDMZX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 1.04%
- 1Y
- 4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.13%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALDX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SDMZX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALDX vs. SDMZX — Risk / Return Rank
PALDX
SDMZX
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) and PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALDX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 2.21 | -1.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 3.89 | -2.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.54 | -0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.42 | 3.30 | -1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.83 | 13.64 | -6.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALDX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 2.21 | -1.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 1.17 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 1.22 | -0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALDX and SDMZX is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Dividend Comparison
PALDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.62%, more than SDMZX's 4.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALDX PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund | 5.62% | 5.42% | 10.40% | 2.94% | 6.19% | 6.87% | 2.58% | 4.58% | 3.65% | 1.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund | 4.30% | 4.62% | 4.57% | 3.36% | 4.70% | 2.76% | 3.10% | 6.18% | 3.47% | 2.64% | 2.76% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALDX drawdown since its inception was -26.16%, which is greater than SDMZX's maximum drawdown of -9.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALDX and SDMZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALDX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.16% | -9.76% | -16.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.20% | -1.44% | -6.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.47% | -8.51% | -11.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -9.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.96% | -1.22% | -4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.16% | -1.00% | -3.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.70% | 0.35% | +1.35% |
Volatility
PALDX vs. SDMZX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM 60/40 Allocation Fund (PALDX) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) at 0.70%. This indicates that PALDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDMZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALDX | SDMZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 0.70% | +2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.86% | 1.40% | +4.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 2.12% | +9.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.08% | 2.30% | +9.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 2.46% | +10.29% |