PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SDMZX vs. VCSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMZX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than VCSH's 0.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX has outperformed VCSH with an annualized return of 3.16%, while VCSH has yielded a comparatively lower 2.67% annualized return.


SDMZX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.18%
YTD
1.15%
6M
1.67%
1Y
5.15%
3Y*
5.84%
5Y*
2.80%
10Y*
3.16%

VCSH

1D
-0.29%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.83%
1Y
4.30%
3Y*
5.47%
5Y*
2.27%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.15%6.18%5.64%6.25%-4.82%-0.19%3.97%7.92%0.95%3.96%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.41%6.77%4.91%6.20%-5.62%-0.63%5.13%7.02%0.92%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMZX and VCSH is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.62

The correlation between SDMZX and VCSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SDMZX vs. VCSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMZX
SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VCSH
VCSH Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VCSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCSH Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VCSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SDMZXVCSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.44

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

3.08

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

12.69

+0.98

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the VCSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMZX and VCSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SDMZXVCSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.29

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.79

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.23

0.80

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.01

+0.19

Drawdowns

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMZX drawdown since its inception was -9.76%, smaller than the maximum VCSH drawdown of -12.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMZX and VCSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SDMZXVCSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-12.86%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.55%

-1.40%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.55%

-1.40%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.51%

-9.48%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.76%

-12.86%

+3.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.55%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-0.97%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.37%

0.34%

+0.03%

Volatility

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCSH) at 0.62%. This indicates that SDMZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SDMZXVCSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

0.62%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

1.41%

+1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

1.90%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.55%

2.88%

-0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.57%

3.35%

-0.78%

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMZX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VCSH's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

SDMZX vs. VCSH - Dividend Comparison

SDMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than VCSH's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SDMZX
PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund
4.69%4.62%4.57%3.36%4.70%2.76%3.10%6.18%3.47%2.64%2.76%3.34%
VCSH
Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.46%4.35%3.96%3.09%2.01%1.81%2.27%2.87%2.65%2.26%2.10%2.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


SDMZX and VCSH have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to VCSH (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMZX dropped -9.76% vs VCSH's -12.86%.

VCSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SDMZX and VCSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer