SDMZX vs. LLDYX

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

SDMZX (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund) and LLDYX (Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SDMZX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by PGIM, while LLDYX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Lord Abbett. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX returned 3.16%/yr vs 2.72%/yr for LLDYX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SDMZX charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for LLDYX.

Performance

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SDMZX achieves a 1.15% return, which is significantly higher than LLDYX's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, SDMZX has outperformed LLDYX with an annualized return of 3.16%, while LLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.72% annualized return.

SDMZX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 5.15%
• 3Y*: 5.84%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 3.16%

LLDYX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.10%
• YTD: 0.78%
• 6M: 1.47%
• 1Y: 4.44%
• 3Y*: 5.19%
• 5Y*: 2.33%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund	1.15%	6.18%	5.64%	6.25%	-4.82%	-0.19%	3.97%	7.92%	0.95%	3.96%
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	0.78%	6.19%	5.13%	5.41%	-5.35%	1.07%	3.17%	5.64%	1.47%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SDMZX and LLDYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014	0.56

The correlation between SDMZX and LLDYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SDMZX vs. LLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SDMZX

SDMZX Risk / Return Rank: 62
SDMZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SDMZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SDMZX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
SDMZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
SDMZX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

LLDYX

LLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 72
LLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
LLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
LLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
LLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) and Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SDMZX	LLDYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	1.86	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	3.33	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.65	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.47	-0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.67	13.92	-0.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SDMZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the LLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SDMZX and LLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SDMZX	LLDYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.62	1.86	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.10	0.85	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.23	1.05	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	1.09	+0.11

Drawdowns

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SDMZX drawdown since its inception was -9.76%, smaller than the maximum LLDYX drawdown of -10.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SDMZX and LLDYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SDMZX	LLDYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.76%	-10.54%	+0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.55%	-1.29%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.55%	-1.29%	-0.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-8.51%	-7.43%	-1.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.76%	-9.67%	-0.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.26%	-1.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.99%	-1.20%	+0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.37%	0.32%	+0.05%

Volatility

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund (SDMZX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund (LLDYX) at 0.73%. This indicates that SDMZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SDMZX	LLDYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.46%	0.73%	+1.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.79%	1.68%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.12%	2.40%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.55%	2.74%	-0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.57%	2.59%	-0.02%

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SDMZX has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LLDYX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

SDMZX vs. LLDYX - Dividend Comparison

SDMZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, less than LLDYX's 5.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LLDYX Lord Abbett Short Duration Income Fund	5.16%	5.21%	4.73%	4.71%	2.58%	2.52%	3.06%	3.79%	4.11%	3.90%	4.15%	4.15%
SDMZX PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond Fund	4.69%	4.62%	4.57%	3.36%	4.70%	2.76%	3.10%	6.18%	3.47%	2.64%	2.76%	3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SDMZX and LLDYX in my portfolio?

SDMZX and LLDYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SDMZX or LLDYX?

SDMZX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to LLDYX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SDMZX dropped -9.76% vs LLDYX's -10.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.