PALC vs. MEME
PALC (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PALC is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PALC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
PALC vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 6.37% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 13.39% return.
PALC
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -4.59%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.10%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.51%
MEME
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -16.21%
- 6M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 13.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.46M | $1.32M | $2.06M | |
| $354.52K | $345.95K | $744.41K |
PALC vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 6.37% | 1.89% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 13.39% | -38.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and MEME is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.55 |
PALC vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PALC
MEME
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
PALC
MEME
Industrials
PALC
MEME
Healthcare
PALC
MEME
Financial Services
PALC
MEME
Consumer Cyclical
PALC
MEME
Communication Services
PALC
MEME
Consumer Defensive
PALC
MEME
-
Basic Materials
PALC
MEME
Utilities
PALC
MEME
Energy
PALC
MEME
Real Estate
PALC
MEME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PALC vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank
PALC
MEME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PALC vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PALC | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.93 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PALC vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -50.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALC | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -50.08% | +25.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -40.42% | +33.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -29.26% | +23.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | — | — |
Volatility
PALC vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PALC | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.60% | 79.06% | -64.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 79.06% | -62.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.29% | 79.06% | -61.77% |
PALC vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
PALC vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.10% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PALC and MEME have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PALC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PALC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
PALC has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PALC and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for PALC and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer