PALC vs. EWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ).
PALC and EWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. EWZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jul 10, 2000. Both PALC and EWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PALC vs. EWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALC vs. EWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | -0.64% | 7.28% | 21.24% | 17.52% | -14.74% | 41.03% | 22.18% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 20.84% | 48.81% | -30.41% | 32.62% | 12.09% | -17.32% | 25.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a -0.64% return, which is significantly lower than EWZ's 20.84% return.
PALC
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 9.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.35%
- 10Y*
- —
EWZ
- 1D
- 4.41%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- 20.84%
- 6M
- 28.18%
- 1Y
- 56.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.24%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALC vs. EWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EWZ's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALC vs. EWZ — Risk / Return Rank
PALC
EWZ
PALC vs. EWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALC | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.63 | 2.19 | -1.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 2.75 | -1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.37 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 4.89 | -3.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.59 | 13.02 | -9.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALC | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 | 2.19 | -1.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.43 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.18 | +0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and EWZ is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALC vs. EWZ - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than EWZ's 4.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.17% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EWZ iShares MSCI Brazil ETF | 4.29% | 5.19% | 8.91% | 5.66% | 12.59% | 9.87% | 1.71% | 2.54% | 2.89% | 1.71% | 1.81% | 4.08% |
Drawdowns
PALC vs. EWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum EWZ drawdown of -77.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and EWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALC | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -77.25% | +52.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -11.44% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -32.24% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.15% | -15.84% | +8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -36.09% | +29.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 4.29% | -1.53% |
Volatility
PALC vs. EWZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) is 4.45%, while iShares MSCI Brazil ETF (EWZ) has a volatility of 12.21%. This indicates that PALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALC | EWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 12.21% | -7.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 19.72% | -10.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.82% | 25.98% | -11.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 27.78% | -11.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 34.34% | -17.11% |