PALC vs. PAMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC).
PALC and PAMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALC is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. PAMC is a passively managed fund by Pacer Advisors that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. Both PALC and PAMC are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PALC or PAMC.
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and PAMC is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PALC vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
PALC:
1.78
PAMC:
1.66
PALC:
2.48
PAMC:
2.41
PALC:
1.32
PAMC:
1.29
PALC:
2.61
PAMC:
3.27
PALC:
8.45
PAMC:
8.60
PALC:
2.80%
PAMC:
3.19%
PALC:
13.32%
PAMC:
16.52%
PALC:
-24.45%
PAMC:
-27.04%
PALC:
-4.87%
PAMC:
-6.63%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a 23.35% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 28.13% return.
PALC
23.35%
-4.45%
3.20%
23.17%
N/A
N/A
PAMC
28.13%
-6.48%
8.05%
27.38%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALC vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PALC and PAMC have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PALC vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PALC vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than PAMC's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 0.56% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% |
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 0.50% | 0.69% | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.30% |
Drawdowns
PALC vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum PAMC drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and PAMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PALC vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) is 3.86%, while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that PALC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.