PALC vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
PALC and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALC is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Lunt Capital U.S. Large Cap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016. Both PALC and GCOW are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PALC vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALC vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | -0.51% | 7.28% | 21.24% | 17.52% | -14.74% | 41.03% | 22.18% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 12.89% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | 17.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALC achieves a -0.51% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.89% return.
PALC
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -6.59%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 9.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -1.51%
- YTD
- 12.89%
- 6M
- 18.87%
- 1Y
- 30.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.78%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALC vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PALC and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
PALC vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
PALC
GCOW
PALC vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALC | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 2.21 | -1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 2.94 | -2.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 2.80 | -1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.39 | 14.21 | -10.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALC | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 2.21 | -1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 1.01 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALC and GCOW is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PALC vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
PALC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GCOW's 4.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALC Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF | 1.17% | 1.08% | 0.93% | 0.74% | 1.69% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.41% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
PALC vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALC drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALC and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALC | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -37.64% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.54% | -10.79% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -21.48% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | -2.11% | -4.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.46% | -5.90% | -0.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 2.18% | +0.61% |
Volatility
PALC vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PALC) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 3.45%. This indicates that PALC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALC | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 3.45% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 7.89% | +1.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 13.89% | +0.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 13.48% | +2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 16.24% | +0.99% |