PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAA vs. CAG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAA vs. CAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAA achieves a 30.01% return, which is significantly higher than CAG's -17.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PAA has outperformed CAG with an annualized return of 5.97%, while CAG has yielded a comparatively lower -5.70% annualized return.


PAA

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.51%
YTD
30.01%
6M
31.47%
1Y
36.35%
3Y*
28.99%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
5.97%

CAG

1D
2.16%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
-17.02%
6M
-19.07%
1Y
-32.99%
3Y*
-21.83%
5Y*
-13.84%
10Y*
-5.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAA vs. CAG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
30.01%14.30%21.38%39.18%35.79%22.24%-50.79%-2.28%2.31%-31.34%
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
-17.02%-33.32%1.46%-22.82%17.52%-2.55%8.69%65.50%-41.99%-2.55%

Correlation

The correlation between PAA and CAG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 1998

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAA:

$15.84B

CAG:

$6.58B

EPS

PAA:

$2.19

CAG:

-$0.09

PS Ratio

PAA:

0.35

CAG:

0.59

PB Ratio

PAA:

1.24

CAG:

0.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAA:

$45.25B

CAG:

$11.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAA:

$1.55B

CAG:

$2.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAA:

$2.54B

CAG:

$792.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAA vs. CAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAA
PAA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAA Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CAG
CAG Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAG Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
CAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAG Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAA vs. CAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAACAGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.81

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

-0.90

+3.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

-1.81

+8.98

PAA vs. CAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the CAG Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAA and CAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAA vs. CAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than CAG's maximum drawdown of -62.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAA and CAG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAACAGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.99%

-62.52%

-29.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-36.75%

+22.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.26%

-56.85%

+34.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.11%

-62.52%

+36.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.92%

-62.52%

-25.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.03%

-59.06%

+49.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.75%

-15.76%

-9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.08%

20.37%

-15.29%

Volatility

PAA vs. CAG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) is 7.32%, while Conagra Brands, Inc. (CAG) has a volatility of 8.53%. This indicates that PAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAACAGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.32%

8.53%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.09%

22.11%

-8.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.47%

28.21%

-9.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.81%

23.36%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.82%

26.20%

+15.62%

Dividends

PAA vs. CAG - Dividend Comparison

PAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, less than CAG's 10.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAG
Conagra Brands, Inc.
10.19%8.09%5.05%4.75%3.32%3.44%2.52%2.48%3.98%2.19%29.36%2.37%
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
7.11%8.46%7.44%7.06%7.08%7.71%10.92%7.50%5.99%9.45%8.21%11.93%

Financials

PAA vs. CAG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Conagra Brands, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
12.47B
2.79B
(PAA) Total Revenue
(CAG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAA vs. CAG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Conagra Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
23.6%
Portfolio components
PAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CAG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 657.70M and revenue of 2.79B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.6%.

PAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 405.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.

CAG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 280.10M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

PAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 551.00M and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.

CAG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Conagra Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 199.80M and revenue of 2.79B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAA and CAG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAG has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PAA (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAA dropped -91.99% vs CAG's -62.52%.

PAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAA and CAG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer