PortfoliosLab logo
PAA vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PAA and ET is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PAA vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PAA:

0.34

ET:

0.81

Sortino Ratio

PAA:

0.51

ET:

1.22

Omega Ratio

PAA:

1.07

ET:

1.17

Calmar Ratio

PAA:

0.16

ET:

0.89

Martin Ratio

PAA:

0.91

ET:

2.83

Ulcer Index

PAA:

7.42%

ET:

7.70%

Daily Std Dev

PAA:

28.10%

ET:

27.56%

Max Drawdown

PAA:

-91.99%

ET:

-87.81%

Current Drawdown

PAA:

-34.83%

ET:

-11.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAA:

$12.13B

ET:

$61.60B

EPS

PAA:

$0.93

ET:

$1.32

PE Ratio

PAA:

18.55

ET:

13.60

PEG Ratio

PAA:

2.27

ET:

0.80

PS Ratio

PAA:

0.24

ET:

0.75

PB Ratio

PAA:

1.26

ET:

1.75

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAA:

$50.14B

ET:

$82.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAA:

$13.75B

ET:

$15.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAA:

$2.04B

ET:

$15.57B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAA achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than ET's -5.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PAA has underperformed ET with an annualized return of -2.46%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 1.90% annualized return.


PAA

YTD

5.15%

1M

-0.60%

6M

4.54%

1Y

7.22%

5Y*

23.35%

10Y*

-2.46%

ET

YTD

-5.09%

1M

5.94%

6M

7.53%

1Y

21.08%

5Y*

28.86%

10Y*

1.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

PAA vs. ET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAA is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAA is 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAA is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAA is 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAA is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAA is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ET
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ET is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ET is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ET is 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ET is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ET is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PAA vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAA and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PAA vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

PAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than ET's 7.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
PAA
Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.
8.09%7.44%7.06%7.08%7.71%13.11%7.50%5.99%9.45%8.21%11.93%4.97%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.22%6.51%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%

Drawdowns

PAA vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAA and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PAA vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) is 9.94%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 11.55%. This indicates that PAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PAA vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20212022202320242025
12.01B
21.02B
(PAA) Total Revenue
(ET) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAA vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
5.2%
19.4%
(PAA) Gross Margin
(ET) Gross Margin
PAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 620.00M and revenue of 12.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 5.2%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 4.08B and revenue of 21.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.4%.

PAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 533.00M and revenue of 12.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.49B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.9%.

PAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 443.00M and revenue of 12.01B, resulting in a net margin of 3.7%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 21.02B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.