PAA vs. ET

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).

Performance

PAA vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAA vs. ET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.	27.03%	14.30%	21.38%	39.18%	35.79%	22.24%	-50.79%	-2.28%	2.31%	-31.34%
ET Energy Transfer LP	19.24%	-9.37%	53.87%	27.87%	55.74%	42.96%	-44.92%	5.88%	-17.74%	-4.66%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAA : $15.76B ET : $70.45B
EPS PAA : $2.04 ET : $1.37
PE Ratio PAA : 10.95 ET : 14.10
PS Ratio PAA : 0.35 ET : 0.84
PB Ratio PAA : 1.60 ET : 1.44
Total Revenue (TTM) PAA : $44.80B ET : $82.63B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAA : $2.17B ET : $18.01B
EBITDA (TTM) PAA : $2.96B ET : $14.93B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAA achieves a 27.03% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 19.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PAA has underperformed ET with an annualized return of 8.77%, while ET has yielded a comparatively higher 20.51% annualized return.

PAA

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 6.79%
• YTD: 27.03%
• 6M: 36.78%
• 1Y: 21.75%
• 3Y*: 31.34%
• 5Y*: 29.02%
• 10Y*: 8.77%

ET

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 6M: 16.88%
• 1Y: 12.07%
• 3Y*: 25.52%
• 5Y*: 29.51%
• 10Y*: 20.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAA vs. ET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAA

PAA Risk / Return Rank: 65
PAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
PAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
PAA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
PAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
PAA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

ET

ET Risk / Return Rank: 57
ET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
ET Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ET Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ET Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
ET Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAA vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAA	ET	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	0.51	+0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	0.86	+0.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.12	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	0.65	+0.32
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.05	1.82	+0.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAA vs. ET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the ET Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAA and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAA	ET	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90	0.51	+0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.08	1.17	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.56	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.36	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between PAA and ET is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PAA vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

PAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.97%, more than ET's 6.87% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAA Plains All American Pipeline, L.P.	6.97%	8.46%	7.44%	7.06%	7.08%	7.71%	10.92%	7.50%	5.99%	9.45%	8.21%	11.93%
ET Energy Transfer LP	6.87%	7.97%	6.51%	8.95%	7.33%	7.41%	17.27%	9.51%	9.24%	6.66%	5.90%	7.42%

Drawdowns

PAA vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAA and ET.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAA	ET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.99%	-87.81%	-4.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.96%	-17.33%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.11%	-25.82%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.92%	-72.82%	-15.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.09%	-1.88%	-10.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-25.95%	+0.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.99%	6.24%	+3.75%

Volatility

PAA vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. (PAA) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.96%. This indicates that PAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAA	ET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.97%	4.96%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.96%	11.68%	+0.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.36%	23.80%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.11%	25.48%	+1.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.28%	36.63%	+5.65%

Financials

PAA vs. ET - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. and Energy Transfer LP over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a gross profit of 712.00M and revenue of 10.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.7%.

ET - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a gross profit of 5.78B and revenue of 22.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.8%.

PAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported an operating income of 354.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

ET - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

PAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Plains All American Pipeline, L.P. reported a net income of 342.00M and revenue of 10.56B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

ET - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Transfer LP reported a net income of 1.46B and revenue of 22.41B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.