PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSM vs. ISCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSM vs. ISCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSM achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than ISCB's 11.43% return.


OUSM

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.69%
YTD
6.80%
6M
6.94%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.71%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*

ISCB

1D
-0.67%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.42%
1Y
29.48%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
9.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSM vs. ISCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
6.80%2.17%13.45%18.82%-7.89%21.45%7.64%28.04%-10.60%10.85%
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
11.43%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSM and ISCB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.90

The correlation between OUSM and ISCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSM vs. ISCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSM
ISCB

Industrials

22.8%
18.5%

Financial Services

21.1%
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

19.3%
11.8%

Technology

13.5%
14.6%

Healthcare

9.2%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.4%

Utilities

3.9%
2.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.4%
4.6%

Energy

0.3%
4.9%

Real Estate

-

8.2%

Industrials

OUSM
22.8%
ISCB
18.5%

Financial Services

OUSM
21.1%
ISCB
15.9%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSM
19.3%
ISCB
11.8%

Technology

OUSM
13.5%
ISCB
14.6%

Healthcare

OUSM
9.2%
ISCB
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

OUSM
4.9%
ISCB
3.4%

Utilities

OUSM
3.9%
ISCB
2.3%

Communication Services

OUSM
3.8%
ISCB
2.6%

Basic Materials

OUSM
1.4%
ISCB
4.6%

Energy

OUSM
0.3%
ISCB
4.9%

Real Estate

OUSM

-

ISCB
8.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSM vs. ISCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSM
OUSM Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
OUSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSM Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSM Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSM vs. ISCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


OUSMISCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.31

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.19

3.15

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.47

11.26

-7.78

OUSM vs. ISCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSM Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the ISCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSM and ISCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


OUSMISCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

1.80

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.27

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.38

+0.10

Drawdowns

OUSM vs. ISCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSM drawdown since its inception was -39.84%, smaller than the maximum ISCB drawdown of -61.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSM and ISCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSMISCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.84%

-61.25%

+21.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.21%

-9.39%

+0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-26.22%

+6.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.44%

-29.94%

+10.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.67%

-1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.22%

-9.80%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.63%

+0.51%

Volatility

OUSM vs. ISCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) is 3.66%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that OUSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSMISCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

4.28%

-0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

11.43%

-2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.15%

16.51%

-3.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.30%

21.39%

-5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

22.68%

-3.74%

OUSM vs. ISCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSM has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCB's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSM vs. ISCB - Dividend Comparison

OUSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than ISCB's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.27%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
OUSM
OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF
2.07%2.09%1.62%1.64%1.98%1.55%2.02%1.99%2.63%2.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSM and ISCB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISCB has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to OUSM (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSM dropped -39.84% vs ISCB's -61.25%.

On 5-year performance, OUSM leads with 7.39% vs 5.72% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OUSM has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OUSM has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 5.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.

OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.27% for ISCB.

OUSM tracks O'Shares US Small-Cap Quality Dividend Index, while ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSM and 0.04% for ISCB.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSM and ISCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer