ISCB vs. IJR
ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and IJR (iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - ISCB tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index while IJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCB returned 9.37%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for IJR. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IJR.
Performance
ISCB vs. IJR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 12.19% return, which is significantly lower than IJR's 16.42% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has underperformed IJR with an annualized return of 9.37%, while IJR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.
ISCB
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 12.19%
- 6M
- 13.62%
- 1Y
- 32.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.37%
IJR
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 16.42%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 34.85%
- 3Y*
- 14.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 10.76%
ISCB vs. IJR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 12.19% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | -19.04% | 17.46% | 6.29% | 29.42% | -13.92% | 12.95% |
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 16.42% | 5.89% | 8.63% | 16.06% | -16.20% | 26.58% | 11.28% | 22.82% | -8.51% | 13.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and IJR is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between ISCB and IJR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCB vs. IJR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCB
IJR
Industrials
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
ISCB
IJR
Financial Services
ISCB
IJR
Technology
ISCB
IJR
Healthcare
ISCB
IJR
Consumer Cyclical
ISCB
IJR
Real Estate
ISCB
IJR
Energy
ISCB
IJR
Basic Materials
ISCB
IJR
Consumer Defensive
ISCB
IJR
Communication Services
ISCB
IJR
Utilities
ISCB
IJR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCB vs. IJR — Risk / Return Rank
ISCB
IJR
ISCB vs. IJR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISCB | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 2.00 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 2.88 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.38 | 3.96 | -0.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.09 | 13.21 | -1.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISCB | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 2.00 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.28 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.47 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.44 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. IJR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than IJR's maximum drawdown of -58.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and IJR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCB | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -58.15% | -3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.68% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.22% | -28.02% | +1.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -28.02% | -1.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -44.36% | +0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.80% | -9.28% | -0.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.63% | 2.60% | +0.03% |
Volatility
ISCB vs. IJR - Volatility Comparison
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF (IJR) have volatilities of 4.27% and 4.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCB | IJR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.46% | -0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.44% | 11.63% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 17.51% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.39% | 21.40% | -0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.69% | 22.91% | -0.22% |
ISCB vs. IJR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IJR's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISCB vs. IJR - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than IJR's 1.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJR iShares Core S&P Small-Cap ETF | 1.14% | 1.44% | 2.05% | 1.31% | 1.41% | 1.53% | 1.11% | 1.44% | 1.58% | 1.20% | 1.22% | 1.48% |
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ISCB and IJR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IJR has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to ISCB (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs IJR's -58.15%.
On 10-year performance, IJR leads with 10.76% vs 9.37% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJR has performed better with a 10.76% return vs 9.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for IJR.
ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.26%, compared with 1.14% for IJR.
ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while IJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.06% for IJR.
IJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCB and IJR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer