PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCB vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCB vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 9.87%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.


ISCB

1D
-0.03%
1M
3.02%
YTD
13.60%
6M
10.99%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
6.24%
10Y*
9.87%

ISCG

1D
0.09%
1M
3.57%
YTD
15.33%
6M
11.70%
1Y
33.36%
3Y*
17.90%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCB vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
13.60%12.46%10.90%19.51%-19.04%17.46%6.29%29.42%-13.92%12.95%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
15.33%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCB and ISCG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004

0.90

The correlation between ISCB and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCB vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCB
ISCG

Industrials

18.5%
24.4%

Technology

16.0%
22.0%

Financial Services

15.6%
9.9%

Healthcare

13.5%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
8.8%

Real Estate

8.1%
4.8%

Basic Materials

4.6%
3.2%

Energy

4.5%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.2%
2.7%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.8%

Utilities

2.2%
1.1%

Industrials

ISCB
18.5%
ISCG
24.4%

Technology

ISCB
16.0%
ISCG
22.0%

Financial Services

ISCB
15.6%
ISCG
9.9%

Healthcare

ISCB
13.5%
ISCG
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCB
11.4%
ISCG
8.8%

Real Estate

ISCB
8.1%
ISCG
4.8%

Basic Materials

ISCB
4.6%
ISCG
3.2%

Energy

ISCB
4.5%
ISCG
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

ISCB
3.2%
ISCG
2.7%

Communication Services

ISCB
2.6%
ISCG
2.8%

Utilities

ISCB
2.2%
ISCG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCB vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCB
ISCB Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ISCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCB Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCB vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISCBISCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

2.93

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.05

11.16

+0.89

ISCB vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCB and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISCB vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCBISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.25%

-57.72%

-3.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-11.43%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.22%

-26.71%

+0.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

-37.80%

+7.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.18%

-41.48%

-2.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-11.61%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

3.00%

-0.38%

Volatility

ISCB vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 4.50%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCBISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

5.78%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.73%

13.64%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.75%

18.60%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

23.03%

-1.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.70%

23.20%

-0.50%

ISCB vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISCB vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than ISCG's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCB
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF
1.30%1.38%1.31%1.49%1.63%1.26%1.26%1.25%1.60%1.24%1.58%1.40%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.58%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, ISCB and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to ISCB (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, ISCG leads with 12.03% vs 9.87% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.58% for ISCG.

ISCB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ISCG is Small Cap Growth Equities. ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.06% for ISCG.

ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCB and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer