ISCB vs. ISCG
ISCB (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF) and ISCG (iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ISCB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while ISCG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCB returned 9.87%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for ISCG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISCB charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for ISCG.
Performance
ISCB vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISCB achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 15.33% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 9.87%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
ISCB
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 3.02%
- YTD
- 13.60%
- 6M
- 10.99%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.18%
- 5Y*
- 6.24%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
ISCG
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 3.57%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 11.70%
- 1Y
- 33.36%
- 3Y*
- 17.90%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
ISCB vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 13.60% | 12.46% | 10.90% | 19.51% | -19.04% | 17.46% | 6.29% | 29.42% | -13.92% | 12.95% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 15.33% | 12.88% | 13.35% | 23.13% | -26.75% | -1.26% | 43.41% | 27.66% | -6.91% | 24.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and ISCG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2004 | 0.90 |
The correlation between ISCB and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISCB vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISCB
ISCG
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Industrials
ISCB
ISCG
Technology
ISCB
ISCG
Financial Services
ISCB
ISCG
Healthcare
ISCB
ISCG
Consumer Cyclical
ISCB
ISCG
Real Estate
ISCB
ISCG
Basic Materials
ISCB
ISCG
Energy
ISCB
ISCG
Consumer Defensive
ISCB
ISCG
Communication Services
ISCB
ISCG
Utilities
ISCB
ISCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISCB vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank
ISCB
ISCG
ISCB vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISCB | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.30 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 2.93 | +0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.05 | 11.16 | +0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than ISCG's maximum drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and ISCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISCB | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.25% | -57.72% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -11.43% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.22% | -26.71% | +0.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.94% | -37.80% | +7.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.18% | -41.48% | -2.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | 0.00% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -11.61% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 3.00% | -0.38% |
Volatility
ISCB vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 4.50%, while iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISCB | ISCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 5.78% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.73% | 13.64% | -1.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.75% | 18.60% | -1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 23.03% | -1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 23.20% | -0.50% |
ISCB vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ISCB vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, more than ISCG's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.30% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.61% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, ISCB and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ISCG has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to ISCB (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCB dropped -61.25% vs ISCG's -57.72%.
On 10-year performance, ISCG leads with 12.03% vs 9.87% for ISCB. On fees, ISCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ISCB has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ISCG has performed better with a 12.03% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISCG.
ISCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.58% for ISCG.
ISCB is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while ISCG is Small Cap Growth Equities. ISCB tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for ISCB and 0.06% for ISCG.
ISCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISCB and ISCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer