ISCB vs. SCHA
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA).
ISCB and SCHA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISCB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. SCHA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both ISCB and SCHA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ISCB or SCHA.
Key characteristics
| ISCB | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 15.49% | 15.83% |
| 1Y Return | 30.18% | 30.70% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 1.82% | 1.56% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.54% | 10.23% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 7.70% | 9.53% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.66 | 1.62 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.36 | 2.31 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.29 | 1.28 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.46 | 1.43 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.17 | 9.30 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.37% | 3.38% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.66% | 19.40% |
| Max Drawdown | -61.25% | -42.41% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.23% | -3.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISCB and SCHA is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ISCB vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ISCB having a 15.49% return and SCHA slightly higher at 15.83%. Over the past 10 years, ISCB has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 7.70%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISCB vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ISCB and SCHA have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ISCB vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ISCB vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
ISCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SCHA's 1.88% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISCB iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF | 1.21% | 1.49% | 1.63% | 1.26% | 1.26% | 1.25% | 1.60% | 1.24% | 1.58% | 1.40% | 1.18% | 0.87% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 1.88% | 2.52% | 2.05% | 1.89% | 1.05% | 2.55% | 2.62% | 1.78% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.85% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
ISCB vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISCB drawdown since its inception was -61.25%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCB and SCHA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ISCB vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Small-Cap ETF (ISCB) is 6.41%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.76%. This indicates that ISCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.