PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. SPYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.19%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.


OUSA

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
0.48%
6M
-0.06%
1Y
10.34%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
8.53%
10Y*
10.19%

SPYG

1D
-2.40%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.46%
1Y
26.87%
3Y*
25.48%
5Y*
14.11%
10Y*
18.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
0.48%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
8.70%22.09%35.99%30.02%-29.41%32.01%33.46%30.84%-0.12%27.24%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and SPYG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and SPYG has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

OUSA vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
SPYG

Technology

26.1%
52.1%

Financial Services

18.0%
9.0%

Healthcare

13.8%
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
8.5%

Industrials

11.2%
5.4%

Communication Services

10.9%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
1.0%

Basic Materials

-

0.3%

Energy

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Technology

OUSA
26.1%
SPYG
52.1%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.0%
SPYG
9.0%

Healthcare

OUSA
13.8%
SPYG
5.9%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
12.7%
SPYG
8.5%

Industrials

OUSA
11.2%
SPYG
5.4%

Communication Services

OUSA
10.9%
SPYG
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.3%
SPYG
1.0%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

SPYG
0.3%

Energy

OUSA

-

SPYG
0.1%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

SPYG
0.6%

Utilities

OUSA

-

SPYG
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYG
SPYG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SPYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYG Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSASPYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.28

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

1.96

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.37

7.79

-3.42

OUSA vs. SPYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the SPYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and SPYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SPYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSASPYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-67.63%

+34.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-13.76%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-22.14%

+9.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-32.67%

+13.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-32.67%

-0.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.14%

-5.52%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-24.28%

+20.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.46%

-1.09%

Volatility

OUSA vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.92%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSASPYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

7.26%

-4.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.42%

13.90%

-6.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

17.26%

-7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

21.36%

-8.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

20.73%

-5.56%

OUSA vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.43%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
SPYG
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF
0.50%0.52%0.60%1.15%1.03%0.62%0.90%1.37%1.51%1.41%1.55%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and SPYG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to OUSA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs SPYG's -67.63%.

On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs 10.19% for OUSA. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.

OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.04% for SPYG.

SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and SPYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer