OUSA vs. SPYG
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.19%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for SPYG. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
OUSA vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed SPYG with an annualized return of 10.19%, while SPYG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.05% annualized return.
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -2.32%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- -0.06%
- 1Y
- 10.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
OUSA vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 0.48% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 33.46% | 30.84% | -0.12% | 27.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and SPYG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between OUSA and SPYG has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
OUSA vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSA
SPYG
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OUSA
SPYG
Financial Services
OUSA
SPYG
Healthcare
OUSA
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
OUSA
SPYG
Industrials
OUSA
SPYG
Communication Services
OUSA
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
OUSA
SPYG
Basic Materials
OUSA
-
SPYG
Energy
OUSA
-
SPYG
Real Estate
OUSA
-
SPYG
Utilities
OUSA
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
SPYG
OUSA vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.96 | -0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.37 | 7.79 | -3.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -67.63% | +34.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -13.76% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -22.14% | +9.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -32.67% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -32.67% | -0.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.14% | -5.52% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -24.28% | +20.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.46% | -1.09% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.92%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.92% | 7.26% | -4.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 13.90% | -6.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.82% | 17.26% | -7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 21.36% | -8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 20.73% | -5.56% |
OUSA vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than SPYG's 0.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.43% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and SPYG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to OUSA (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 10-year performance, SPYG leads with 18.05% vs 10.19% for OUSA. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 18.05% return vs 10.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.50% for SPYG.
OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SPYG tracks S&P 500 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer