OUSA vs. SCHD
OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - OUSA is a Quality Factor fund tracking the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.36%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SCHD. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
OUSA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.36%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.
OUSA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- YTD
- 6.53%
- 1Y
- 15.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.36%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.68%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 31.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.76%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $914.72K | $1.31M | $1.45M | |
| $786.88M | $715.86M | $685.58M |
OUSA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 6.53% | 10.23% | 17.09% | 13.44% | -9.33% | 23.75% | 6.96% | 25.03% | -3.11% | 18.81% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 24.03% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between OUSA and SCHD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015 | 0.86 |
The correlation between OUSA and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
OUSA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
OUSA
SCHD
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
OUSA
SCHD
Financial Services
OUSA
SCHD
Healthcare
OUSA
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
OUSA
SCHD
Industrials
OUSA
SCHD
Communication Services
OUSA
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
OUSA
SCHD
Basic Materials
OUSA
-
SCHD
Energy
OUSA
-
SCHD
Real Estate
OUSA
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
OUSA
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
OUSA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
OUSA
SCHD
OUSA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| OUSA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.51 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 6.74 | -4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 17.01 | -10.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
OUSA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| OUSA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.12% | -33.37% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -4.61% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -16.13% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.54% | -16.85% | -2.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.12% | -33.37% | +0.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -1.24% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -3.30% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.39% | 1.82% | +0.57% |
Volatility
OUSA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| OUSA | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 4.11% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.11% | 8.11% | 0.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.27% | 11.13% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.38% | 14.39% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.19% | 16.72% | -1.53% |
OUSA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
OUSA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF | 1.36% | 1.39% | 1.50% | 1.81% | 1.92% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 2.31% | 3.06% | 2.15% | 2.32% | 1.17% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.13% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
OUSA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 10.36% for OUSA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.36% for OUSA.
OUSA is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHD is Dividend. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for OUSA and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer