PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 6.53% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 10.36%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


OUSA

1D
0.11%
1M
1.87%
6M
4.63%
YTD
6.53%
1Y
15.60%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
10.36%
ALL TIME*
10.68%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$914.72K$1.31M$1.45M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

OUSA vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
6.53%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and SCHD is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.86

The correlation between OUSA and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

OUSA vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
SCHD

Technology

23.7%
12.7%

Financial Services

18.6%
9.9%

Healthcare

15.1%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.1%
7.7%

Industrials

11.9%
7.8%

Communication Services

10.3%
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.4%
20.6%

Basic Materials

-

1.2%

Energy

-

14.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

OUSA
23.7%
SCHD
12.7%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.6%
SCHD
9.9%

Healthcare

OUSA
15.1%
SCHD
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
13.1%
SCHD
7.7%

Industrials

OUSA
11.9%
SCHD
7.8%

Communication Services

OUSA
10.3%
SCHD
6.2%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.4%
SCHD
20.6%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

SCHD
1.2%

Energy

OUSA

-

SCHD
14.1%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

SCHD

-

Utilities

OUSA

-

SCHD
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

OUSA vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSASCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

6.74

-4.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

17.01

-10.79

OUSA vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSASCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-33.37%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-4.61%

-3.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-16.13%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-16.85%

-2.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-33.37%

+0.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.75%

-1.24%

+0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-3.30%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

1.82%

+0.57%

Volatility

OUSA vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 4.00% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSASCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

4.11%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.11%

8.11%

0.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

11.13%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.38%

14.39%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

16.72%

-1.53%

OUSA vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.36%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and SCHD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to OUSA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 10.36% for OUSA. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 1.36% for OUSA.

OUSA is categorized as Quality Factor, while SCHD is Dividend. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer