PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
OUSA vs. DIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

OUSA vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 0.34% return, which is significantly lower than DIA's 8.40% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed DIA with an annualized return of 10.18%, while DIA has yielded a comparatively higher 13.70% annualized return.


OUSA

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
0.34%
6M
-0.10%
1Y
11.47%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
10.18%

DIA

1D
0.30%
1M
2.44%
YTD
8.40%
6M
7.75%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
10.75%
10Y*
13.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
0.34%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
8.40%14.71%14.82%16.02%-7.02%20.83%9.59%24.70%-3.74%28.08%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and DIA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.88

The correlation between OUSA and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
OUSA
DIA

Technology

26.1%
19.1%

Financial Services

18.0%
27.3%

Healthcare

13.8%
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
11.0%

Industrials

11.2%
18.1%

Communication Services

10.9%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.3%
4.1%

Basic Materials

-

3.7%

Energy

-

2.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

OUSA
26.1%
DIA
19.1%

Financial Services

OUSA
18.0%
DIA
27.3%

Healthcare

OUSA
13.8%
DIA
12.8%

Consumer Cyclical

OUSA
12.7%
DIA
11.0%

Industrials

OUSA
11.2%
DIA
18.1%

Communication Services

OUSA
10.9%
DIA
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

OUSA
7.3%
DIA
4.1%

Basic Materials

OUSA

-

DIA
3.7%

Energy

OUSA

-

DIA
2.2%

Real Estate

OUSA

-

DIA

-

Utilities

OUSA

-

DIA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

OUSA vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

DIA
DIA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


OUSADIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.35

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

2.52

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.86

9.72

-4.86

OUSA vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and DIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


OUSADIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.12%

-51.87%

+18.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

-9.76%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-15.95%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.54%

-20.76%

+1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.12%

-36.70%

+3.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.27%

-0.57%

-2.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.52%

-7.13%

+3.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.36%

2.52%

-0.16%

Volatility

OUSA vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) is 2.95%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that OUSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


OUSADIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

4.16%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.41%

9.76%

-2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

12.45%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.31%

14.84%

-1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.18%

17.57%

-2.39%

OUSA vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

OUSA vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than DIA's 1.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DIA
State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust
1.39%1.43%1.61%1.81%1.91%1.58%1.87%1.85%2.24%1.97%2.26%2.33%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.44%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


OUSA and DIA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DIA has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to OUSA (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs DIA's -51.87%.

On 10-year performance, DIA leads with 13.70% vs 10.18% for OUSA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, OUSA has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DIA has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 10.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.39% for DIA.

OUSA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while DIA tracks Dow Jones Industrial Average. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.16% for DIA.

DIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for OUSA and DIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer