OUSA vs. PFM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

OUSA (OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF) and PFM (Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - OUSA tracks the O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index while PFM tracks the NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, OUSA returned 10.22%/yr vs 11.82%/yr for PFM. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. OUSA charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for PFM.

Performance

OUSA vs. PFM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, OUSA achieves a 1.05% return, which is significantly lower than PFM's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, OUSA has underperformed PFM with an annualized return of 10.22%, while PFM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.82% annualized return.

OUSA

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 1.02%
• YTD: 1.05%
• 6M: 1.29%
• 1Y: 9.81%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 10.22%

PFM

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 3.40%
• YTD: 8.18%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 16.31%
• 5Y*: 10.63%
• 10Y*: 11.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

OUSA vs. PFM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.05%	10.23%	17.09%	13.44%	-9.33%	23.75%	6.96%	25.03%	-3.11%	18.81%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	8.18%	14.00%	16.87%	11.40%	-6.22%	23.08%	9.53%	26.88%	-4.58%	17.65%

Correlation

The correlation between OUSA and PFM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015	0.94

The correlation between OUSA and PFM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

OUSA vs. PFM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	OUSA	PFM
Technology	23.4%	24.7%
Financial Services	18.5%	18.5%
Healthcare	14.1%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	13.4%	4.0%
Industrials	11.6%	11.1%
Communication Services	11.4%	1.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	12.0%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Energy	-	4.7%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	4.2%

Return for Risk

OUSA vs. PFM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OUSA

OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 27
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 26
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 29

PFM

PFM Risk / Return Rank: 62
PFM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PFM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PFM Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PFM Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

OUSA vs. PFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) and Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	OUSA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.09	-1.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	3.07	-1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.38	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.78	-1.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	11.28	-7.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

OUSA vs. PFM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current OUSA Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the PFM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of OUSA and PFM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	OUSA	PFM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	2.09	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65	0.79	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68	0.78	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.53	+0.16

Drawdowns

OUSA vs. PFM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum OUSA drawdown since its inception was -33.12%, smaller than the maximum PFM drawdown of -53.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OUSA and PFM.

Drawdown Indicators

	OUSA	PFM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.12%	-53.21%	+20.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.36%	-7.09%	-1.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.14%	-14.50%	+1.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.54%	-17.81%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.12%	-32.22%	-0.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.58%	-0.23%	-2.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.53%	-6.94%	+3.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.35%	1.75%	+0.60%

Volatility

OUSA vs. PFM - Volatility Comparison

OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) has a higher volatility of 2.25% compared to Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF (PFM) at 2.04%. This indicates that OUSA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	OUSA	PFM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.25%	2.04%	+0.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.18%	7.13%	+0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	9.47%	+0.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.30%	13.54%	-0.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	15.21%	-0.05%

OUSA vs. PFM - Expense Ratio Comparison

OUSA has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than PFM's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

OUSA vs. PFM - Dividend Comparison

OUSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than PFM's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
OUSA OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF	1.42%	1.39%	1.50%	1.81%	1.92%	1.56%	2.03%	2.31%	3.06%	2.15%	2.32%	1.17%
PFM Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF	1.33%	1.41%	1.58%	1.86%	1.95%	1.69%	1.92%	1.94%	2.27%	1.70%	2.56%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both OUSA and PFM in my portfolio?

OUSA and PFM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, OUSA or PFM?

OUSA has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to PFM (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, OUSA dropped -33.12% vs PFM's -53.21%.

Which ETF is better, OUSA or PFM?

On 10-year performance, PFM leads with 11.82% vs 10.22% for OUSA. On fees, OUSA is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, PFM has been the lower-risk option at 2.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, OUSA or PFM?

Over the 10-year period, PFM has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 10.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, OUSA or PFM?

OUSA is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for PFM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, OUSA or PFM?

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 1.33% for PFM.

What is the main difference between OUSA and PFM?

OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index, while PFM tracks NASDAQ US Broad Dividend Achievers Index. They also come from different issuers: O'Shares Investments and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for OUSA and 0.53% for PFM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.