ONEY vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ONEY (SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - ONEY tracks the Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ONEY returned 8.74%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ONEY charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

ONEY vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEY achieves a 14.26% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.72% return.

ONEY

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 14.26%
• 6M: 14.38%
• 1Y: 23.42%
• 3Y*: 15.65%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: 12.04%

AUSF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ONEY vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	14.26%	7.74%	11.63%	11.12%	-3.60%	37.11%	2.17%	27.45%	-14.38%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.72%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEY and AUSF is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.90

The correlation between ONEY and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEY vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ONEY	AUSF
Industrials	13.9%	11.7%
Energy	13.2%	5.2%
Consumer Defensive	12.2%	8.5%
Consumer Cyclical	11.8%	7.8%
Utilities	10.6%	4.0%
Financial Services	10.2%	18.7%
Real Estate	9.7%	4.1%
Basic Materials	8.2%	4.0%
Technology	4.8%	13.5%
Healthcare	3.8%	12.0%
Communication Services	1.6%	10.6%

Return for Risk

ONEY vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ONEY

ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 58
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 54
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 62

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 44
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ONEY vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ONEY	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	1.50	+0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.86	2.18	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.26	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.60	+0.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.15	7.54	+3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ONEY vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEY Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEY and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ONEY	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	1.50	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.54	0.94	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.61	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.62	0.65	-0.03

Drawdowns

ONEY vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEY drawdown since its inception was -46.80%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEY and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ONEY	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.80%	-44.25%	-2.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.61%	-5.84%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.50%	-12.29%	-5.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.93%	-14.23%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.18%	-2.26%	+2.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.98%	-4.22%	-0.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.11%	2.01%	+0.10%

Volatility

ONEY vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) has a higher volatility of 2.78% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that ONEY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ONEY	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	2.41%	+0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.42%	6.65%	+1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.39%	10.14%	+2.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.15%	13.65%	+2.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.87%	19.07%	+0.80%

ONEY vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEY has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ONEY vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

ONEY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, more than AUSF's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ONEY SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF	2.81%	3.15%	3.18%	3.14%	3.17%	2.46%	2.74%	3.17%	3.72%	10.73%	6.31%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ONEY and AUSF in my portfolio?

ONEY and AUSF have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ONEY or AUSF?

ONEY has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEY dropped -46.80% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, ONEY or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 8.74% for ONEY. On fees, ONEY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ONEY or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 8.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ONEY or AUSF?

ONEY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ONEY or AUSF?

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 2.76% for AUSF.

What is the main difference between ONEY and AUSF?

ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEY and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.