ONEV vs. LVHD
ONEV (SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ONEV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ONEV returned 11.55%/yr vs 8.42%/yr for LVHD. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ONEV charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
ONEV vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 8.04% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has outperformed LVHD with an annualized return of 11.55%, while LVHD has yielded a comparatively lower 8.42% annualized return.
ONEV
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 8.04%
- 6M
- 6.69%
- 1Y
- 13.02%
- 3Y*
- 12.94%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- 11.55%
LVHD
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 10.55%
- 1Y
- 14.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.42%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
ONEV vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 8.04% | 8.14% | 11.76% | 13.28% | -8.15% | 29.19% | 6.66% | 30.66% | -5.30% | 18.11% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.18% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between ONEV and LVHD is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2015 | 0.74 |
The correlation between ONEV and LVHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
ONEV vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ONEV
LVHD
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Energy
Industrials
ONEV
LVHD
Healthcare
ONEV
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
ONEV
LVHD
Technology
ONEV
LVHD
Financial Services
ONEV
LVHD
Utilities
ONEV
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
ONEV
LVHD
Real Estate
ONEV
LVHD
Basic Materials
ONEV
LVHD
-
Communication Services
ONEV
LVHD
Energy
ONEV
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ONEV vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
ONEV
LVHD
ONEV vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ONEV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 2.28 | -0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | 5.67 | +0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ONEV vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, which is greater than LVHD's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ONEV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.72% | -37.32% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.75% | -6.17% | -1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.81% | -14.29% | -0.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -16.75% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.72% | -37.32% | -2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.86% | +0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.88% | -4.03% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.27% | 2.48% | -0.21% |
Volatility
ONEV vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) is 2.89%, while Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD) has a volatility of 4.04%. This indicates that ONEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ONEV | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.89% | 4.04% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.91% | 7.23% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 9.95% | +1.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 12.92% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 15.53% | +1.50% |
ONEV vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ONEV vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than LVHD's 3.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.27% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% | 0.00% |
ONEV SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF | 1.87% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 1.79% | 1.80% | 1.44% | 1.87% | 2.07% | 2.14% | 6.91% | 3.73% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ONEV and LVHD have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHD has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to ONEV (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.55% vs 8.42% for LVHD. On fees, ONEV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ONEV has been the lower-risk option at 2.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.55% return vs 8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ONEV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 1.87% for ONEV.
ONEV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while LVHD is Dividend. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while LVHD tracks Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ONEV and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer