PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 16.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ONEV having a 11.33% annualized return and VOE not far behind at 10.86%.


ONEV

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.18%
6M
8.72%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
11.33%
ALL TIME*
11.65%

VOE

1D
-0.23%
1M
2.29%
6M
11.88%
YTD
16.60%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
10.86%
ALL TIME*
9.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.03M$3.31M$4.42M
$50.20M$55.46M$54.15M

ONEV vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
12.07%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
16.60%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and VOE is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.87

The correlation between ONEV and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEV vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
VOE

Industrials

17.7%
13.8%

Financial Services

17.0%
18.7%

Healthcare

12.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
7.6%

Technology

8.3%
8.1%

Real Estate

8.3%
5.8%

Utilities

8.2%
12.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.7%
1.5%

Energy

2.3%
11.7%

Industrials

ONEV
17.7%
VOE
13.8%

Financial Services

ONEV
17.0%
VOE
18.7%

Healthcare

ONEV
12.3%
VOE
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
11.3%
VOE
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
9.1%
VOE
7.6%

Technology

ONEV
8.3%
VOE
8.1%

Real Estate

ONEV
8.3%
VOE
5.8%

Utilities

ONEV
8.2%
VOE
12.6%

Basic Materials

ONEV
2.7%
VOE
6.7%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.7%
VOE
1.5%

Energy

ONEV
2.3%
VOE
11.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEV vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEVVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.39

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.60

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

13.97

-6.40

ONEV vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-61.50%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-6.93%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-18.45%

+3.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-19.70%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-43.18%

+3.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-1.31%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-8.29%

+4.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

1.79%

+0.45%

Volatility

ONEV vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.70%. This indicates that ONEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

2.70%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

8.10%

+0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

11.36%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

15.89%

-1.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

18.73%

-1.70%

ONEV vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ONEV has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEV vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than VOE's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.80%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.82%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, ONEV and VOE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to VOE (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, ONEV leads with 11.33% vs 10.86% for VOE. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEV has performed better with a 11.33% return vs 10.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for ONEV.

VOE has the higher dividend yield at 1.82%, compared with 1.80% for ONEV.

ONEV is categorized as Low Volatility, while VOE is Mid Cap Value Equities. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for ONEV and 0.05% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer