PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ONEV vs. ONEY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ONEV vs. ONEY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ONEV achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than ONEY's 18.31% return. Over the past 10 years, ONEV has underperformed ONEY with an annualized return of 11.33%, while ONEY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.04% annualized return.


ONEV

1D
-0.50%
1M
1.18%
6M
8.72%
YTD
12.07%
1Y
17.56%
3Y*
11.92%
5Y*
8.81%
10Y*
11.33%
ALL TIME*
11.65%

ONEY

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.22%
6M
12.45%
YTD
18.31%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
13.34%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
12.04%
ALL TIME*
12.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.03M$3.31M$4.42M
$5.01M$5.36M$5.13M

ONEV vs. ONEY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
12.07%8.14%11.76%13.28%-8.15%29.19%6.66%30.66%-5.30%18.11%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
18.31%7.74%11.63%11.12%-3.60%37.11%2.17%27.45%-8.71%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between ONEV and ONEY is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.85

The correlation between ONEV and ONEY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ONEV vs. ONEY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ONEV
ONEY

Industrials

17.7%
9.8%

Financial Services

17.0%
17.8%

Healthcare

12.3%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.1%
11.2%

Technology

8.3%
5.9%

Real Estate

8.3%
11.2%

Utilities

8.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.2%

Energy

2.3%
8.0%

Industrials

ONEV
17.7%
ONEY
9.8%

Financial Services

ONEV
17.0%
ONEY
17.8%

Healthcare

ONEV
12.3%
ONEY
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ONEV
11.3%
ONEY
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

ONEV
9.1%
ONEY
11.2%

Technology

ONEV
8.3%
ONEY
5.9%

Real Estate

ONEV
8.3%
ONEY
11.2%

Utilities

ONEV
8.2%
ONEY
10.8%

Basic Materials

ONEV
2.7%
ONEY
5.5%

Communication Services

ONEV
2.7%
ONEY
3.2%

Energy

ONEV
2.3%
ONEY
8.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ONEV vs. ONEY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ONEV
ONEV Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ONEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEY
ONEY Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ONEY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEY Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ONEV vs. ONEY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ONEVONEYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.35

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.20

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

11.88

-4.31

ONEV vs. ONEY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ONEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the ONEY Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ONEV and ONEY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ONEV vs. ONEY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ONEV drawdown since its inception was -39.72%, smaller than the maximum ONEY drawdown of -46.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ONEV and ONEY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ONEVONEYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.72%

-46.80%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-7.61%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.81%

-17.50%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-18.93%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.72%

-46.80%

+7.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-1.85%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.85%

-4.93%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.05%

+0.19%

Volatility

ONEV vs. ONEY - Volatility Comparison

SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF (ONEV) and SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF (ONEY) have volatilities of 4.58% and 4.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ONEVONEYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.58%

4.41%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.49%

8.87%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

12.47%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.59%

16.06%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

19.81%

-2.78%

ONEV vs. ONEY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ONEV and ONEY have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ONEV vs. ONEY - Dividend Comparison

ONEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than ONEY's 2.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ONEV
SPDR Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focus ETF
1.80%1.81%1.88%1.79%1.80%1.44%1.87%2.07%2.14%6.91%3.73%0.21%
ONEY
SPDR Russell 1000 Yield Focus ETF
2.77%3.15%3.18%3.14%3.17%2.46%2.74%3.17%3.72%10.73%6.31%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ONEV and ONEY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ONEV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to ONEY (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ONEV dropped -39.72% vs ONEY's -46.80%.

On 10-year performance, ONEY leads with 12.04% vs 11.33% for ONEV. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, ONEY has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ONEY has performed better with a 12.04% return vs 11.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ONEV and ONEY have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

ONEY has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.80% for ONEV.

ONEV is categorized as Low Volatility, while ONEY is Mid Cap Value Equities. ONEV tracks Russell 1000 Low Volatility Focused Factor (TR), while ONEY tracks Russell 1000 Yield Focused Factor Index.

ONEY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ONEV and ONEY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer